Transient and tracking performance analysis of the quantized lms algorithm for time-varying system identification

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 1990-1997

  Bermudez, José Carlos M ^a   Bershad, Neil J ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); ITERATIVE METHODS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PERFORMANCE; SIGNAL THEORY; TIME VARYING CONTROL SYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE WEIGHTS; DIGITAL WORDLENGTH; LEAST MEAN SQUARE ALGORITHMS; QUANTIZATION; TIME VARYING SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION;

ADAPTIVE FILTERING;

EID: 0030212731     PISSN: 1053587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/78.533720     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. B. Widrow and S. Stearns, Adaptive Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
2. B. Widrow, J. M. McCool, M. G. Larimore, and C. R. Johnson, Jr., Stationary and nonstationary learning characteristics of the LMS adaptive filter, Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, pp. 1151-1162, Aug. 1976.
3. W. A. Gardner, Nonstationary learning characteristics of the LMS algorithm, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-34,pp. 1199-1207, Oct. 1987.
4. O. Macchi, Optimization of adaptive identification for time-varying filters, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-31, pp. 283-287, Mar. 1986.
5. S. Marcos and O. Macchi, Tracking capability of the least mean square algorithm: Application to an asynchronous echo canceller, IEEE Trans. Acaust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35, pp. 1570-1578, Nov. 1987.
6. R. D. Gitlin, J. E. Mazo, and M. G. Taylor, On the design of gradient algorithms for digitally implemented adaptive filters, IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory, vol. CT-20, pp. 125-136, Mar. 1973.
7. C. Caiaiscos and B. Liu, A roundoff error analysis of the LMS adaptive algorithm, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-32, pp. 34-41, Feb. 1984.
8. S. T. Alexander, Transient weight misadjustment properties for the finite precision LMS algorithm, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-53, pp. 1250-1258, Sept. 1987.
9. N. J. Bershad, On weight update saturation nonlinearities in LMS adaptation, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 38, pp. 623-630, Apr. 1990.
10. D. L. Duttweiller, Adaptive filter performance with nonlinearities in the correlation multiplier, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-30, pp. 578-586, Aug. 1982.
11. N. J. Bershad, On the optimum data nonlinearity in LMS adaptation, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-34, pp. 69-76, Feb. 1986.
12. _, On error-saturation nonlinearities in LMS adaptation, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 36, pp. 440-452, Apr. 1988.
13. J. M. Cioffi, Limited-precision effects in adaptive filtering, IEEE Trans. Circuits and System, vol. CAS-34, pp. 821-833, July 1987.
14. J. C. M. Bermudez and N. J. Bershad, A nonlinear analytical model for the quantized LMS algorithm - The arbitrary step size case, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 44, pp. 1175-1184, May 1996.
15. N. J. Bershad and J. C. M. Bermudez, A nonlinear analytical model for the quantized LMS algorithm - The power-of-two step size case, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, to be published.
16. _, New insights on the transient and steady-state behaviors of the quantized LMS algorithm, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, to be published.
17. S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991.
18. S. K. Mitra and J. F. Kaiser, Eds., Handbook for Digital Signal Processing. New York: Wiley. 1993.
19. A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989.
20. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.