BMJ response to Dr Gupta

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 245-256

  Craft, Naomi ^a   Smith, Richard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Copyright violation; Ethics; Forwarding of rejected letters; Letters; Scientific letter writing; Scientific review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BMJ (BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL); EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL; PUBLIC RELATIONS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; WRITING;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BMJ (BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL); EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ATTITUDE; AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; DISCLOSURE; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 0030211049     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.4.245     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. International Committee of Medical Editors. Statements from the Vancouver Group. British Medical Journal 1989; 299: 1394-5.
2. Instructions to authors. British Medical Journal 1995; 310: 50-3.
3. Tonks A, Bhopal R. The role of letters in reviewing research. British Medical Journal 1994; 308: 1583-4.