The effects of time constraints on the prechoice screening of decision options

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 222-228

  Benson III, Lehman ^a   Beach, Lee Roy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030209899     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0075     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2. Beach, L. R. (1993). Broadening the definition of decision making: The role of prechoice screening of options. Psychological Science, 4, 215-220.
3. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1990). Image theory: A behavioral theory of decisions in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Beach, L. R., Puto, C. P., Heckler, S. E., Naylor, G., & Marble, T. A. (1996). Differential versus unit weighting of violations, framing, and the role of probability in image theory's compatibility test. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 77-82.
5. Beach, L. R., & Strom, E. (1989). A toadstool among the mushrooms: Screening decisions and image theory's compatibility test. Acta Psychologica, 72, 1-12.
6. Benson, L., III, & Svenson, O. (1992). Post-decision consolidation following the debriefing of subjects about experimental manipulations affecting their prior decisions. Psychological Research Bulletin, 32, 1-13.
7. Dawes, R. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.
8. Dawes, R., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 94-106.
9. Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Judgment and decision making under time pressure: Studies and findings. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York: Plenum.
10. McAllister, D., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1979). The contingency model for selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 228-244.
11. Maule, J., & Mackie, P. (1990). A componential investigation of the effects of deadlines on individual decision making. In K. Borchering, O. I. Larichev & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary issues in decision making. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 14, 534-552.
13. Svenson, O., & Benson, L., III. (1993a). Framing and time pressure in decision making. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York: Plenum.
14. Svenson, O., & Benson, L., III. (1993b). On Experimental instructions and the inducement of time pressure behavior. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York: Plenum.
15. Svenson, O., Edland, A., & Slovic, P. (1990). Choices between incompletely described alternatives under time stress. Acta Psychologica, 75, 153-169.
16. Svenson, O. & Maule, A. J. (Eds.) (1993), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York: Plenum.
17. Smith, J. F., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1982). A cost benefit mechanism for selecting problem-solving strategies: Some extensions and empirical tests. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 370-396.
18. Wright, P. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressure, distraction and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.
19. Zakay, D. (1985). Post-decision confidence and conflict experienced in a choice process. Acta Psychologica, 58, 75-80.