Remote sensing and geographic information systems;Télédétection et systèmes d'information géographique

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 593-607

  Baumgartner, M F ^a   Apfl, G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; REMOTE SENSING;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELS;

HYDROLOGY;

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; GIS; HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; IMAGE PROCESSING; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 0030209357     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626669609491527     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, J. A., 1994. “ Spatial data:data types, data applications and reasons for partial adaption and non-integration. ”. In Environmental Remote Sensing from Regional to Global Scale Edited by:Foody, G., and Curran, P., 214–222. Chichester, UK:Wiley.
2. Antenucci, J. C., Brown, K., Croswell, P. L., Kevany, M. J., and Archer, H, eds. 1991. Geographic Information Systems—A Guide to the Technology New York, USA:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3. Asrar, G., ed. 1989. Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing, Wiley Series in Remote Sensing New York:Wiley. USA
4. Baumgartner, M. F., 1990. “ Snow cover mapping and snowmelt runoff simulations on microcomputers. ”. In Remote Sensing and the Earth's Environment, European Space Agency (ESA), Paris, France. SP-301 77–85.
5. Baumgartner, M. F., 1995. Use of digital satellite image processing, geographic information systems, and modelling in snow hydrology and climatology. Tech. Rep. RS-11 Switzerland:Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Berne.
6. Baumgartner, M. F., and Apfl, G., 1994. Towards an integrated geographic analysis system with remote sensing, GIS and consecutive modelling for snow cover monitoring. Int. J. Remote Sens., 15 (7):1507–1518.
7. Baumgartner, M. F., and Rango, A., 1995. A microcomputer-based alpine snow cover analysis system. Photogramm. Engng Remote Sens., 61 (12):1475–1486.
8. Burrough, P. A., and Frank, A. U., 1995. Concepts and paradigms in spatial information:are current geographical information systems truly generic?. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sys., 9 (2):101–116.
9. Carroll, T. R., 1995. Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards Edited by:Carrara, A., and Guzzetti, F., 335–342. The Netherlands:Kluwer. GIS used to derive operational hydrologic products from in situ and remotely sensed data. In:ed
10. Cowen, D. J., Jensen, J. R., Bresnahan, P. J., Ehler, G. B., Graves, D., Huang, X., Wiesner, C., and Mackey, H. E., 1995. The design and implementation of an integrated geographic information system for environmental applications. Photogramm. Engng Remote Sens., 61 (11):1393–1404.
11. Duda, R. O., and Hart, P. E., 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis New York, USA:Wiley Interscience.
12. Ehlers, M., Greenlee, D., Smith, T., and Star, J., 1991. Integration of remote sensing and GIS:data and data access. Photogramm. Engng Remote Sens., 57 (6):669–775.
13. Engman, E. T., and Gurney, R. J., 1991. Remote Sensing in Hydrology London, UK:Chapman & Hall.
14. Estes, J. E., 1992. Remote sensing and GIS integration:research needs, status and trends. ITC Journal, 1992–1:2–10.
15. Fabbri, A. G., 1992. Remote sensing, geographic information systems and the environment:a review of interdisciplinary issues. ITC Journal, 1992–2:119–126.
16. Frank, A. U., Egenhofer, M. J., and Kuhn, W., 1991. A perspective on GIS technology in the nineties. Photogramm. Engng Remote Sens., 57 (11):1431–1436.
17. Haefner, H., and Pampaloni, P., 1992. Water resources. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13 (6&7):1277–1303.
18. Haralick, R. M., 1976. Topics in Applied Physics, Vol.II Edited by:Rosenfeld, A., 5–63. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany:Springer. Automatic remote sensor image processing. In:Digital Picture Analysis ed
19. ILWIS. 1990. ILWIS:Integrated Land and Water Information System, User's Manual (Version 1.2), Int. Enschede, The Netherlands:Inst, for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Computer Department.
20. Itten, K. I., Staenz, K., Baumgartner, M. F., and Johnson, T., 1985. “ A stepwise hierarchical multi-binary approach in TM landuse classification. ”. In Proc. 5th IEEE/IGARSS Symp. (Amherst, Massachusetts, USA) 965–969.
21. Li, Deren. 1992. From photogrammetry to iconic informatics. ZPF—Zeitschrift für Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung, 1:5–9.
22. Lillesand, T. M., and Kiefer, R. W., 1994. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation (3rd edn) New York:Wiley. USA
23. Martinec, J., Rango, A., and Roberts, R., 1994. The Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) User's Manual Edited by:Baumgartner, M. F., Switzerland:Geographica Bernensia P-29, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Berne.
24. Matsuyama, T., 1987. Knowledge-based aerial image understanding systems and expert systems for image processing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., GE-25 (3):305–316.
25. Nagao, M., and Matsuyma, T., 1980. A Structural Analysis of Complex Aerial Photographs New York, USA:Plenum Press.
26. Paola, J. D., and Schowengerdt, R. A., 1995. A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely-sensed multi-spectral imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens., 16 (16):3033–3058.
27. Raper, J., and Livingstone, D., 1995. Development of a geomorphological spatial model using object-oriented design. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sys., 9 (4):359–384.
28. Schanda, E., 1986. Physical Fundamentals of Remote Sensing Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany:Springer.
29. Schowengerdt, R. A., 1983. Techniques for Image Processing and Classification in Remote Sensing Orlando, USA:Academic Press.
30. Sharma, S. K., and Ajaneyulu, D., 1993. Application of remote sensing and GIS in water resources management. Int. J. Remote Sens., 14 (17):3209–3220.
31. Swain, P. H., and Davis, S. M., eds. 1978. Remote Sensing:The Quantitative Approach New York, USA:McGraw-Hill.
32. Zhan, F. B., and Buttenfield, B. P., 1995. Object-oriented knowledge-based symbol selection for visualizing statistical information. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sys., 9 (3):293–316.