A comparison of pulpectomy alone versus pulpectomy with trephination for the relief of pain

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 422-425

  Moos, Heidi L ^a  

^a Branch Dental Clinic Newport   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PAIN; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DENTAL PULP DISEASES; HUMANS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PERIAPICAL PERIODONTITIS; PULPECTOMY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH APEX; TOOTHACHE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0030209152     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80244-5     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2:1127-31.
2. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976;2:175-84.
3. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45-56.