Rate-dependent Perception of Aspiration and Pre-aspiration in Icelandic

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 745-764

  Pind, Jörgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; HUMAN; ICELAND; LANGUAGE; SPEECH; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

HUMANS; ICELAND; LANGUAGE; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030208485     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755645     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Árnason, K. (1986). The segmental and suprasegmental status of pre-aspiration in modern Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 9, 1-23.
2. Bladon, A. (1986). Phonetics for hearers. In G. McGregor (Ed.), Language for hearers (pp. 1-24). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
3. Catford, J. (1977). Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Diehl, R.L., & Walsh, M.A. (1989). An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2154-2164.
5. Epstein, W. (1973). The process of "taking-into-account" in visual perception. Perception, 2, 267-285.
6. Finney, D.J. (1971). Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Green, K.P., Stevens, E.B., & Kuhl, P.K. (1994). Talker continuity and the use of rate information during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 249-260.
8. Jusczyk, P.W. (1986). Speech perception. In K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J.P. Thomas, (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. New York: John Wiley.
9. Klatt, D.H. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 971-995.
10. Klatt, D.H., & Klatt, L.C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857.
11. Ladefoged, P. (1993). A course in phonetics. (3rd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
12. Liberman, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Shankweiler, D.P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
13. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation. A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling (pp. 403-439). Dordrecht: Klüwer.
14. Lindblom, B. (1994). Role of articulation in speech perception: Clues from production. Paper presented at the 127th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, June 1994.
15. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Spectrographic measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
16. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1-28.
17. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 563-567). Prague: Academia.
18. Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Mattingly, I.G., Liberman, A.M., Syrdal, A.K., & Halwes, T. (1971). Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 131-157.
20. Miller, J.L. (1987). Rate-dependent processing in speech perception. In A.W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, Vol. III (pp. 119-157). Hove, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
21. Miller, J.L., Aibel, I.L., & Green, K. (1984). On the nature of rate-dependent processing during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 5-15.
22. Miller, J.L., Green, K.P., & Reeves, A. (1986). Speaking rate and segments: A look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43, 106-115.
23. Miller, J.L., & Volaitis, L.E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 505-512.
24. Nooteboom, S.G. (1979). Complex control of simple decisions in the perception of vowel length. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, volume II (pp. 298-304). Copenhagen: Institute of Phonetics.
25. Pétursson, M. (1972). La préaspiration en islandais moderne. Examen de sa réalisation phonétique chez deux sujets. Studia Linguistica, 26, 61-80.
26. Pind, J. (1986). The perception of quantity in Icelandic. Phonetica, 43, 116-139.
27. Pind, J. (1995a). Speaking rate, VOT and quantity: The search for higher-order invariants or two Icelandic speech cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 291-304.
28. Pind, J. (1995b). Constancy and normalization in the perception of Voice Offset Time as a cue for pre-aspiration. Acta Psychologica, 89, 53-81.
29. Port, R.F., & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 141-152.
30. Stevens, K.N. (1960). Toward a model for speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 47-55.
31. Stevens, K.N. (1993). Models for the production and acoustics of stop consonants. Speech communication, 13, 367-375.
32. Stevens, K.N., & Blumstein, S.E. (1981). The search for invariant acoustic correlates of acoustic features. In P.D. Eimas & J.L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the study of speech (pp. 1-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Summerfield, Q. (1981). On articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1074-1095.
34. Summerfield, Q., & Haggard, M. (1977). On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 435-448.
35. Volaitis, L.E., & Miller, J.L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723-735.