Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of neural code efficacies I. Graded photoreceptor potentials and data quality

Biological Cybernetics

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 93-103

  Cheng, Zixi ^a,b   Wasserman, Gerald S ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; LIMULUS; PHOTORECEPTOR; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HORSESHOE CRABS; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHOTORECEPTORS, INVERTEBRATE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0030207668     PISSN: 03401200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004220050277     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barlow HB, Levick WR (1969) Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 200 : 1-24
2. Behrens ME, Wulff VJ (1965) Light-initiated responses of retinula and eccentric cells in the Limulus lateral eye. J Gen Physiol 48 : 1081-1093
3. Cariani P (1995) As if time really mattered: temporal strategies for neural coding of sensory information. Commun Cogn - AI 12 : 157-219
4. Cheng Z, Wasserman GS (1991) Signal detection analysis of neural code efficacies in single photoreceptor: effects of stimulus intensity and light adaptation (abstract). Soc Neurosci Abstr 17 : 298
5. Cheng Z, Wasserman GS (1996) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of neural code efficacies: II. Optic nerve action potentials and neural transmission. Biol Cybern 75 : 105-115
6. Chung S-H, Raymond SA, Lettvin JY (1970) Multiple meaning in single visual units. Brain Behav Evol 3 : 72-101
7. Cohn T (1977) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of sensitivity in neural systems. Proc IEEE 65 : 781-785
8. Cohn T (1983) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of photoreceptor sensitivity. IEEE Trans Syst, Man and Cybern 13 : 873-881
9. Cohn T, Green DG, Tanner WP Jr (1975) Receiver operating characteristic analysis: Application to the study of quantum fluctuation effects in optic nerve of Rana pipiens. J Gen Physiol 66 : 583-616
10. Easland GS, Wasserman GS (1979) Multiple intracellular contributions to light adaptation in Limulus ommatidia. Vision Res 19 : 1-8
11. Fahrenbach WH (1969) The morphology of the eyes of Limulus. II. Ommatidia of the compound eye. Z Zellforsch 93 : 451-483
12. Fahrenbach WH (1971) The morphology of the Limulus visual system. IV. The lateral optic nerve. Z Zellforsch 114 : 532-545
13. Felsten G, Wasserman GS (1980) Visual masking: Mechanisms and theories. Psychol Bull 88 : 329-353
14. Felsten G, Wasserman GS (1981) The photoreceptor sensory code for perceived duration during visual masking. Physiol Psychol 9 : 68-76
15. Fitzhugh R (1957) The statistical detection of threshold signals in the retina. J Gen Physiol 40 : 925-948
16. Geisler WS (1988) Ideal-observer analysis of single neuron responses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29 [Suppl] 297
17. Geisler WS, Albrecht DG, Salvi RJ, Saunders SS (1991) Discrimination performance of single neurons: Rate and temporal-pattern information. J Neurophysiol 66 : 334-361
18. Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Krieger, New York
19. Guido W, Lu S-M, Vaughn JW, Godwin DW, Sherman SM (1995) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of neurons in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus during tonic and burst response mode. Vis Neurosci 12 : 723-741
20. e for M-alternative forced choice. Percept Psychophys 26 : 168-170
21. Kong K-L, Wasserman GS (1978a) Temporal summation in the receptor potential of the Limulus lateral eye: Comparison between retinula and eccentric cells. Sens Proc 2 : 9-20
22. Kong K-L, Wasserman GS (1978b) Changing response measures alters temporal summation in the receptor and spike potentials of the Limulus lateral eye. Sens Proc 2 : 21-31
23. Kuffler SW (1953) Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol 16 : 37-68
24. Laughlin SB (1976) The sensitivities of dragonfly photoreceptors and the voltage gain of transduction. J Comp Physiol 111 : 221-247
25. Levick WR (1967) Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbit's retina. J Physiol (Lond) 188 : 285-307
26. Levick WR, Thibos LN, Cohn TE, Catanzaro D, Barlow HB (1983) Performance of cat retinal ganglion cells at low light levels. J Gen Physiol 82 : 405-426
27. Lillywhite PG (1977) Single photon signals and transduction in an insect eye. J Comp Physiol 122 : 189-200
28. Lillywhite PG (1978) Coupling between locust photoreceptors revealed by a study of quantum bumps. J Comp Physiol 125 : 13-27
29. Lillywhite PG, Laughlin SB (1979) Transducer noise in a photoreceptor. Nature 277 : 569-572
30. Nisly SJ, Wasserman GS (1987) Perceived duration, visual persistence, and neural integration. Percept Psychophys 42 : 400-406
31. Nisly SJ, Wasserman GS (1989) Intensity dependence of perceived duration: data, theories, and neural integration. Psychol Bull 106 : 483-496
32. Perkel DH, Bullock TH (1969) Neural coding. Neurosci Res Prog Bull 63 : 221-351
33. Tanner WP (1956) Theory of recognition. J Opt Soc Am 28 : 882-888
34. Thomas JP, Gille J, Barker RA (1982) Simultaneous detection and identification: data and theory. J Opt Soc Am 72 : 1642-1651
35. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Dean AF (1983) The statistical reliability of signals in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vis Res 23 : 775-785
36. Uttal WR (1973) The psychobiology of sensory coding. Harper and Row, New York
37. Wang LT, Wasserman GS (1985) Direct intracellular measurement of non-linear postreceptor transfer functions in dark and light adaptation in Limulus. Brain Res 328 : 41-50
38. Wang-Bennett LT, Wasserman GS (1991) Visual cells in excised Limulus eyes: Dark adaptation reveals evidence of response duality. Bull Psychon Soc 29 : 75-78
39. Warzecha A-K, Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1993) Reliability of neural coding and real-time-performance of spiking and nonspiking motion sensitive cells in the blowfly (abstract). Soc Neurosci Abstr 19 : 337
40. Wasserman GS (1976) Limulus psychophysics: Spectral sensitivity of the ventral eye. J Exp Psychol: Gen 105 : 240-253
41. Wasserman GS (1992a) Isomorphism, task dependence, and the multiple meaning theory of neural coding. Biol Sig 1 : 117-142
42. Wasserman GS (1992b) Visual cells in excised Limulus eyes. II. Excision does not reduce sensitivity to light. Bull Psychonom Soc 30 : 120-122
43. Wasserman GS, Cheng Z (1994) Are Limulus with variegated carapaces visually incompetent? An electroretinographic characterization of their visual sensitivity relative to Limulus with uniform carapaces (abstract). Soc Neurosci Abstr 20 : 778
44. Wasserman GS, Cheng Z (1996) Electroretinographic (ERG) measures of vision in horseshoe crabs with uniform versus variegated carapaces. Biol Signals (in press)
45. Wasserman GS, Felsten G, Easland GS (1979) The psychophysical function: Harmonizing Fechner and Stevens. Science 204 : 85-87
46. Weckstrom M (1989) Light and dark adaptation in fly photoreceptor: Duration and time integral of the impulse response. Vision Res 29 : 1309-1317
47. Wulff VJ, Mueller WJ (1973) On the origin of the receptor potential in the lateral eye of Limulus. Vision Res 13 : 661-671