Trail Making Test: Normative values from287 normal adult controls

Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 305-309

  Giovagnoli, A R ^a   Del Pesce, M ^b   Mascheroni, S ^c   Simoncelli, M ^c   Laiacona, M ^c   Capitani, E ^c  

^a IRCCS   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Conceptual and visual motor tracking; Divided attention; Shifting ability; Trail making test

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REFERENCE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRAIL MAKING TEST;

EID: 0030202510     PISSN: 03920461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01997792     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ACKERMANN H.: Mehrdimensionale nicht-pammetrische Normbereiche. Metodologische und medi: 'he Aspekte. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1985.
2. ARMITAGE S.: Analysis of certain psychological u v used for the evaluation of brain damage. Pshychol. Mkm.,60: 149-156, 1946.
3. BASSO A.,CAPITANI E., LAIACONA M.: Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices: normative values on300 adult normal controls. Functional Neurology, 2: 189-194, 1987.
4. |4] BOLL T.M.,REITAN R.M.: Effect of age on performance of the Trail Making Test. Percept. Mot. Skills., 36: 691694, 1973.
5. CAPITANI E.,LAIACONA M.: Aging and psychometricdiagnosis of intellectual impairment: some considerations on test scores and their use. Devep. Neuropsychol., 4: 325-330, 1988.
6. CORRIGAN J.D.,HINKELDEY M.S.: Relationships between parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. ï. Clin. Psychol., 43: 402-409, 1987.
7. DAVIES A.D.M.: The influence of age on the Trail Making Test performance. ). Cons. Psychol.,24: 96-98, 1968.
8. GASS C.S.,DANIEL S.K.: Emotional impact on Trail Making Test performance. Psychol. Rep., 67: 435-438, 1990.
9. GORDON N.G.: The Trail Making Test in neuropsycho-logical diagnosis. J. Clin. Psychol.,28: 167-169, 1972. [10] GORDON N.G.: Diagnostic efficiencv of the Trail Making Test as a function of cut-off score, diagnosis, and age. Percept. Mot. Skills., 47: 191-195, 1978.
10. [II] GOUL W.R.,BROWN M.: Effects of age and intelligence on Trail Making Test performance and validity. Percept. Mot. Skills30: 319-326, 1970.
11. KENNEDY K.J.: Age effects on Trail Making Test performance. Percept. Mot. Skills, 52: 671-675, 1981.
12. KLUSMAN L.E.,GRIPE L.I., DODRILL C.B.: Analysis of errors on the Trail Making Test. Percept. Mot. Skills, 68: 1199-1204, 1989.
13. LEZAK M.: Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, 381-384, 1995.
14. LiNDSEY B.A.,CoppiNGER N.W.: Age-related deficits in simple capabilities and their consequences for Trail Making performance. ). Clin. Psychol., 25: 156-159, 1969.
15. NIELSEN H.,KNUDSEN L., DAUGBJERG O.: Normative data for eight neuropsychological tests based on a Danish sample. Scand. J. Psychol., 30: 37-45, 1989.
16. ORGEL S.,MCöONALD R.: An evaluation of the Trail Making Test. ). Cons. Psychol., 31: 77-78, 1967.
17. PARSONS O.A.,MASLOW H.I., MORRIS F., DENNY P.: Trail Making Test performance in relation to certain experiments, tests, and subject variables. Percept. Mot. Skills, 19: 199-206, 1964.
18. REITAN R.M.: The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage, i. Cons. Psychol.,19: 393-394, 1955.
19. REITAN R.M.: Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indication of organic brain damage. Percept. Mot. Skills, 8: 271-276, 1958.
20. REITAN R.M.: Trail making Test for normal and braindamaged children of early school age. Percept. Mot. Skills, 33: 575-581, 1971.
21. REITAN R.M.,WOLFSON D.: The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychology Press, Tucson, AZ, 1985.
22. ROSSINI E.D.,KARL M.A.: The Trail Making Test A and B: a technical note on structural noneauivalence. Percept. Mot. Skills, 78: 625-626, 1994.
23. RüSSEL E.W.,NEURINGER C, GOLDSTEIN G.: Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological key approach. John Wiley, New York, 1970.
24. SELNES O.A.,JACOBSON L., MACHADO A.M. et al.: Normative data for a brief neuropsychological screening battery. Percept. Mot. Skills, 73: 539-550, 1991.
25. SPREEN O.,BENTON A.L.: Comparative studies of some psychological tests for cerebral damage. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 140: 323-333, 1965.
26. WYSOCKI J.J.,SWEET J.J.: Identification of brain-damaged, schizophrenic, and normal medical patients using a brief neuropsychological screening battery. Inter. J. Clin. Neuropsychol., 7: 40-44, 1985.