|
Volumn 34, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 649-654
|
Are current hydrophone low frequency response standards acceptable for measuring mechanical/cavitation indices?
|
Author keywords
Mechanical cavitation indices; PVDF hydrophones; Ultrasonic hydrophone calibration
|
Indexed keywords
CALIBRATION;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
FREQUENCY RESPONSE;
HIGH PASS FILTERS;
PRESSURE;
SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION;
STANDARDS;
ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT;
WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;
FREQUENCY RESPONSE STANDARDS;
HIGH PASS FILTERING;
MECHANICAL CAVITATION INDICES;
PRESSURE WAVEFORM;
RARE FRACTIONAL PRESSURE;
ULTRASONIC HYDROPHONE CALIBRATION;
HYDROPHONES;
ALGORITHM;
ARTICLE;
ECHOGRAPHY;
EUROPE;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MATERIALS TESTING;
MECHANICS;
OSCILLOMETRY;
PRESSURE;
SIGNAL PROCESSING;
STANDARD;
TRANSDUCER;
ULTRASOUND;
UNITED STATES;
ALGORITHMS;
EUROPE;
MATERIALS TESTING;
MECHANICS;
OSCILLOMETRY;
PRESSURE;
SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
TRANSDUCERS;
ULTRASONICS;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0030201341
PISSN: 0041624X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/0041-624X(96)00052-2 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (22)
|
References (7)
|