A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China

Contraception

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 33-38

  Xu, Jin Xun ^b   Rivera, R ^a   Dunson, T R ^a   Zhuang, L Q ^b   Yang, X L ^b   Ma, G T ^b   Chi, I C ^a  

^a FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b Shanghai Municipa Fam Plan Commn ^*

Author keywords

Copper T 380A IUD (TCu 380A IUD); immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI); intrauterine device; vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST FEEDING; CHINA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; FORCEPS; HAND; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PUERPERIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0030200536     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00117-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. 1. Chi I-c, Farr G. Postpartum IUD contraception - a review of an international experience. Adv Contracept 1989;5:127-46.
2. 2. Xu J-X, Reusche C, Burdan A. Immediate postplacental insertion of the intrauterine device: a review of Chinese and the world's experiences. Adv Contracept 1994;10: 71-82.
3. 3. Edelman DA, Berger GS, Keith LG. Intrauterine devices and their complications. Boston: CK Hall, 1979:40-1.
4. 4. Thiery M, Van Kets H, Van der Pas H. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion: the expulsion problem. Contraception 1985;31:331-49.
5. 5. Cole LP, Edelman DA, Potts DM, Wheeler RG, Laufe LE. Postpartum insertion of modified intrauterine devices. J Reproduct Med 1984;29:677-82.
6. 6. National IUD Clinical Research Group. Observations on the clinical efficacies and side effects of six different timing of IUD insertions. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 22:350-3.
7. 7. Younis MN, Hamed AF, et al. The effect of postplacental insertion of spiked and the standard Lippes Loop on uterine involution. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1989;28:263-7.
8. 8. Apelo RA, Waszak CS. Postpartum IUD insertion in Manila, Philippines. Adv Contracept 1985;1:319-28.
9. 9. World Health Organization. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. 1987; Technical Report Series 753.
10. 10. World Health Organization. Basic clinical aspects of intrauterine devices: report of a WHO Scientific Group. 1966; Technical Report Series 332.
11. 11. Tietze C, Lewit S. Evaluation of intrauterine devices; ninth progress report of the cooperative statistical program. Stud Fam Plann 1970;55:1-40.
12. 12. Potter RG. Use-effectiveness of intrauterine contraception as a problem in competing risks. In: Freedman R, Takeshita J, eds. Family Planning in Taiwan. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969:458-84.
13. 13. Azen SP, Roy S, Pike MC, Casagrande J, Mishell DR. A new procedure for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Am the Obstet Gynecol 1977; 128:329.
14. 14. Xu J-X, Connell C, Chi I-C. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion - a report on Chinese experience. Adv Contracept 1992;8:281-90.
15. 15. Zhou SW, Chi I-C. Immediate postpartum IUD insertions in a Chinese hospital - a two-year follow-up. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991;35:157-64.
16. 16. Kets HV, Parewijck W, Van der Pas H, et al. Immediate postplacental insertion and fixation of the CuFix postpartum implant system. Contraception 1993;48:349-57.
17. 17. Chi I-c, Potts M, Wilkens LR, Champion CB. Performance of the copper T-380A intrauterine device in breastfeeding women. Contraception 1989;39:603-12.
18. 18. Schmidt F, Sivin I, Waldman S. The copper T 380 IUD. In: Bardin CW, Mishell DR, eds. Proceedings from the Fourth International Conference on IUDs. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994:298-307.
19. 19. Forster RM, Albfright GA. Anesthetic management of high-risk mother and fetus. In: Sciarra JJ, ed. Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol 3/Chap 90. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1995:11.