Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 373-381

  Njeh, C F ^a   Hodgskinson, R ^b   Currey, J D ^b   Langton, C M ^c  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancellous bone; compressive strength; ultrasound velocity; Young's modulus

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CALCULATIONS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); DISEASES; ELASTIC MODULI; ELASTICITY; MECHANICAL TESTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; ULTRASONIC VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

ANTERO-POSTERIOR DIRECTIONS; APPARENT DENSITY; BOVINE CANCELLOUS BONE; ORTHOGONAL RELATIONSHIPS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PROXIMAL DISTAL DIRECTIONS;

BONE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BONE STRENGTH; CANCELLOUS BONE; CATTLE; FRACTURE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 0030199935     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00064-X     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN and Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: A quantitative CT study. J. Computer Assisted Tomography 1990; 14(1): 107-114.
2. Stevenson JC and Whitehead MI. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. British Med. J. 1982; 285: 585-588.
3. Avioli LV, Brandenburger G, Chesnut C, Gallagher JC, Heaney RP, Lappe J and Recker RR. Ultrasound transmission velocity in screening for bone fragility. J. Bone Min. Res. 1988; 3: 215-219.
4. Alhava ME. Bone density measurement, Calcif. Tissue Int. (suppl) 1991; 49: S21-S23.
5. Lang P, Steiger P, Faulkner K, Gluer C and Genant HK. Current techniques and recent developments in quantitative bone densitometry. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1991; 29(1): 49-76.
6. Ostlere SJ and Gold RH. Osteoporosis and bone density measurement methods. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 1991; 271: 149-163.
7. Hayes WC and Gehart TN. Biomechanics of bone: Applications for assessment of bone strength. In Peck WA (ed.). Bone and Mineral Research, Annual III, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1985; 259-294.
8. Turner CH, Cowin SC, Rho JY, Ashman RB and Rice JC. The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J. Biomechanics 1990; 23(6): 549-561.
9. Whitehouse WJ. The quantitative morphometry of anisotropic trabecular bone. J. Microscopy 1974; 101: 153-168.
10. Harrigan TP, Jasty M, Mann RW and Harris WH. Limitation of the continuity assumption in cancellous bone mechanics. Transaction of the 31st annual meeting of the orthopaedic research society, Orth. Res. Soc. 1985; 135.
11. Cowin SC. The relationship between the elasticity tensor and fabric tensor. Mechanic Material 1985; (4): 137-147.
12. Hodgskinson R and Currey JD. Effect of structural variation on Young's modulus of non-human cancellous bone. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. 1990; 20: 43-52.
13. Goldstein SA. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomical location and function. J. Biomechanics 1987; 1055-1061.
14. Currey JD. The mechanical properties of bone. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 1970; 73: 210-231.
15. Langton CM, Ali AV, Riggs CM, Evans GP and Bonfield W. A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1990b; 11(3): 243-249.
16. Brear K, Currey JD and Raines S. Density and temperature effects on some mechanical properties of cancellous bone. Eng. in Med. 1988; 17(4): 163-167.
17. Evans JA and Tavakoli MB. Ultrasonic attenuation and velocity in bone. Phys. Med. Biol. 1990; 35(10): 1387-1396.
18. Linde F and Hvid I. Stiffness behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J. Biomechanics. 1987; 20(1): 83-89.
19. Pugh JW, Rose RM and Radin EL, Reily DT, Burstein AH and Frankel VH. The elastic modulus for bone. J. Biomechanics 1974; 7: 271-275.
20. Carter DR and Haves WC. Bone compressive strength: The influence of density and strain rate. Science 1976; 194: 1174-1175.
21. Bowman AW and Robinson BR. Introduction to regression and analysis of variance. Adam Hilger, London, 1990.
22. Wolf J. Entrablatt fur die medizinische Wissenschaft 1869; VI: 223.
23. Williams JL and Lewis JL. Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis. J. Biomech. Eng. 1982; 104: 50-56.
24. Bensusan JS, Davy DT, Heiple KG and Verdin PJ. Tensile, compressive and torsional testing of cancellous bone. Trans. 29th orthop. Res. Soc. 1983; 8: 132.
25. Ciarrelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Dickie D, Ku KL, Kapper M, Stanley J, Flynn MJ and Matthews LS. Experimental determination of the orthogonal mechanical properties, density and distribution of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions utilizing material testing and computed tomography. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 1986; 42.
26. Cassidy JJ and Davy DT. Mechanical and architectural properties in bovine cancellous bone. Trans-Orthop. Res. Soc. 1985; 354.
27. Gibson LJ. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J. Biomechanics 1985; 18: 317-328.
28. Currey JD. Power Law models for the mechanical properties of cancellous bone. Eng. in Med. 1986; 15(3): 153-154.
29. Rice JC, Cowin CS and Bowman AJ. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J. Biomechanics 1988; 21: 155-168.
30. Carter DR and Haves WC. The compressive behaviour of bone as a two phase porous structure. J. Bone and Jt. Surg. 1977; 59A: 954-962.
31. Gibson LJ and Ashby MF. Cellular Solids. Pergamon Press, 1988; 316-330.
32. Kaye and Laby. Tables of physical and chemical constants. Longman, 15th edition, 1986.
33. Ashman RB, Corin JD and Turner CH. Elastic properties of cancellous bone measurement by an ultrasonic technique. J. Biomechanics 1987; 20(10): 979-986.