User requirements on the future laboratory information systems

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 87-93

  Brender, J ^a   McNair, P ^b  

^a Medical Informatics Laboratory ApS   (Denmark)

^b HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Interoperability; Laboratory information systems; Management; Open architecture; Security; Telematics; User requirements

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; SPECIFICATIONS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

FUNCTIONALITY; INTEROPERABILITY; LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEM; OPEN ARCHITECTURE; PLUG AND PLAY FASHION; TELEMATICS; USER REQUIREMENTS;

USER INTERFACES;

CLINICAL LABORATORY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; SHORT SURVEY; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0030199249     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0169-2607(96)01738-Q     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. P. McNair and J. Brender, Information enhancement in clinical decision making by controlled data generation, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 50 (Suppl 202) (1990) 112-119.
2. J.M. McDonald and J.A. Smith, Value-added laboratory medicine in an era of managed care. Clin. Chem. 41 (1995) 1256-1262.
3. G.J. Buffone and D.R. Moreau, Laboratory computing - process and information management supporting high-quality, cost-effective healthcare, Clin. Chem. 41 (1995) 1338-1344.
4. Clinics in laboratory medicine, laboratory and hospital information systems, eds. R.D. Aller and F.R. Elevitch (W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1991).
5. Specification of the architecture for an open clinical laboratory information systems environment, Technical report ARCH-3, eds. J. Brender, W. Grimson, M. Yearworth, J. Grimson and P. McNair, Part 2 1-20 (OpenLabs (A2028) AIM Project, 1995).
6. W. Grimson, J. Grimson, T. Groth, R. O'Moore and V. Wade, The OpenLabs approach to clinical laboratory computing, in Proceedings of the Eight World Congress on Medical Informatics, eds. R.A. Greenes, H.E. Peterson and D.J. Protti, pp. 373-376 (Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada Inc., Alberta, Canada, 1995).
7. The Liason Committee on Hospital Computing - Ireland, Guidelines for hospital laboratory computer systems, Clinica Chimica Acta 222 (1993) 147-171.
8. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications 830-1993 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., New York, 1994).
9. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC21/WG7, ODP basic reference model of ODP - parts 1 to 4, N10746-1 to 4 (ISO/IEC, New York, 1993).
10. G.J.E, de Moor, Towards a standard for electronic data interchange in laboratory medicine, Thesis, University of Ghent, 1994.
11. P. Wilding, The changing role of the clinical laboratory scientist: coming out of the basement, Clin. Chem. 41 (1995) 1211-1214.
12. J.T. Kelly, Role of clinical practice guidelines and clinical profiling in facilitating optimal laboratory use. Clin. Chem. 41 (1995) 1234-1236.
13. B.A. Friedman and W. Mitchell, Integrating information from decentralized laboratory testing sites. The creation of a value-added network, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 99 (1993) 637-642.
14. B. Müller, Laboratory diagnostics in light of massive changes in official health policies. Clin. Chem. 40 (1994) 1658-1662.
15. F. Elevitch, K. Spackman, M. Weilert, R. Aller and M. Skinner, A clinical laboratory information systems survey. A challenge for the decade, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 117 (1993) 12-21.
16. J.E. Hammond, The laboratory workstation: a data management model for a small laboratory section, J. Med. Syst. 17 (1993) 299-307.