Quantitative field evaluation of magnetic-flux-leakage and ultrasonic in-line inspection

Pipes and Pipelines International

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 23-32

  Crouch, Al ^a   Anglisano, Richard ^b   Jaarah, Mohammed ^c  

^a SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL GRID   (United States)

^c Pipetronix Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORROSION; DEFECTS; INSPECTION; MAGNETIC LEAKAGE; MECHANICAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION; PERFORMANCE; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE; PIGGING; TEST SPOOL; ULTRASONIC IN LINE INSPECTION;

GAS PIPELINES;

EID: 0030198132     PISSN: 0032020X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. J.A.De Raad, 1986. Comparison between ultrasonic and magnetic flux pigs for pipeline inspection with examples of ultrasonic pigs. The First International Subsea Pigging Conference, September 23-25, Haugesund, Norway, organized by Pipes & Pipelines International.
2. A.E.Crouch, 1991. In-line inspection of natural gas pipelines. Gas Research Institute Topical Report GRI-91/0365.
3. J.C.Harle, 1991. Corrosion history of the Trans-Alaska pipeline. Pipeline Pigging and Inspection Technology conference, February 4-7, Houston, TX, organized by Pipes & Pipelines International and Pipe Line Industry.
4. H.J.M.Jansen et al., 1992. A comparison between magnetic flux leakage and ultrasonic techniques to detect corrosion in pipelines. Pipeline Pigging and Inspection Technology conference, February 17-20, Houston, TX, organized by Pipes & Pipelines International and Pipe Line Industry.
5. P.M.Hoyt, 1992. A comparison of ultrasonic and diverted magnetic flux pipeline inspection technologies. Pipeline Pigging and Inspection Technology conference, February 17-20, Houston, TX, organized by Pipes & Pipelines International and Pipe Line Industry.