Grouping as a searching process for minimum-energy configurations of labelled random fields

Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 157-174

  Murino, Vittorio ^a   Regazzoni, Carlo S ^a   Foresti, Gian Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; FUNCTIONS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

DIRECT HOUGH TRANSFORM; ENERGY FUNCTION; GIBBS DISTRIBUTION; IMAGE REPRESENTATION; MARKOV RANDOM FIELD; MULTIPLE NEIGHBORHOOD SYSTEM; NONLINEAR COST FUNCTION; VISUAL DESCRIPTIVE PRIMITIVES; VOTING MECHANISM;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0030195265     PISSN: 10773142     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cviu.1996.0051     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. G. Kanisza, Organization in Vision, Praeger, New York, 1979.
2. W. E. L. Grimson, Object Recognition by Computer, The Role of Geometric Constraints, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
3. D. G. Lowe, Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition, Kluwer, Boston, MA, 1985.
4. D. T. Clemens, Region-based feature interpretation for recognition 3D models in 2D images, MIT Technical Report AI TR 1307, 1990.
5. D. J. Jacobs, GROPER: A grouping based recognition system for two dimensional objects, IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision, Miami Beach, FL, 1987.
6. D. P. Huttenlocher and P. C. Wayner, Finding convex edge grouping in an image, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, HI, 1991, pp. 406-441.
7. G. L. Foresti, V. Murino, and C. S. Regazzoni, A distributed hierarchical regularization system for recognition of planar surfaces, Opt. Eng. 32(6), 1993, 1167-1192.
8. V. Murino, G. L. Foresti, C. S. Regazzoni, and G. Vernazza, Grouping of rectilinear segments by the labeled hough transform, Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process. Image Understand. 59(1), 1994, 22-24.
9. E. Hancock and J. Kittler, Discrete relaxation, Pattern Recognit. 23(7), 1990, 711-733.
10. R. A. Hummel and S. W. Zucker, On the foundations of relaxation labelling processes, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 5(2), 1983, 267-287.
11. J. Besag, Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems, J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 34, 1972, 75-83.
12. S. Geman and D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 6(6), 1984, 721-741.
13. J. Canny, A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 8(6), 1986, 679-698.
14. T. M. Van Veen and F. C. A. Groen, Discretization errors in the Hough transform, Pattern Recognit. 14, 1981, 137-145.
15. D. B. Shu, C. C. Li, J. F. Mancuso, and Y. N. Sun, A line-extraction method for automated SEM inspection of VLSI resist, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 10(1), 1988, 117-120.
16. C. M. Brown, Inherent bias and noise in the Hough transform, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 5(5), 1983, 493-505.
17. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220(4598), 1983, 671-680.
18. D. Geiger and M. Girosi, Parallel and deterministic algorithms for MRFs: Surface reconstruction, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 13(5), pp. 401-412, 1991.
19. D. Marr, Vision, Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.