Inferential representation of science documents

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 419-429

  Park, Hongseok ^a  

^a NONE   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; QUERY LANGUAGES; USER INTERFACES;

INFERENTIAL COMMUNICATION MODEL; INFERENTIAL REPRESENTATION; NONTOPICAL COMPONENTS; SCIENCE DOCUMENTS; TOPICAL COMPONENTS;

DATA STRUCTURES;

EID: 0030192736     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(95)00071-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barry, C. L. (1993). A preliminary examination of clues to relevance criteria within document representations. Proceedings of the 56th ASIS Annual Meeting, 30, 81-86.
2. Cool, C., Belkin, N. J., Frieder, O., & Kantor, P. (1993). Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judgment. Paper presented at the 14th National Online Meeting, New York, NY.
3. Cuadra, C. A., & Katter, R. V. (1967). Experimental Studies of Relevance Judgment: Final Report. Santa Monica, CA: System Development Corporation.
4. Gay, L. S., & Croft, W. B. (1990). Interpreting nominal compounds for information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 26, 21-38.
5. Leonard, L. E. (1975). Inter-Indexer Consistency and Retrieval Effectiveness: Measurement and Relationship. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois.
6. Markey, K. (1984). Interindexer consistency tests: A literature review and report of a test of consistency in indexing visual materials. Library and Information Science Research, 6, 155-177.
7. Metzler, D. P., Hass, S. W., & Cosic, C. L. (1990). Conjunction, ellipsis, and other discontinuous constituents in the constituent object parser. Information Processing & Management, 26, 53-71.
8. Park, H. (1995). Inferential Relevance and Its Implications to Inferential Information Retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
9. Park, T. K. (1993). The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study. Library Quarterly, 63(3), 318-351.
10. Salton, G. (1989). Automatic Test Processing. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
11. Salton, G., Buckley, C., & Smith, M. (1990). On the application of syntactic methodologies in automatic text analysis, Information Processing & Management, 26, 73-92.
12. Schamber, L. (1991). User's Criteria for Evaluation in Multimedia Information Seeking and Use Situations. Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
13. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
14. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Pub.
16. Wang, P., & Soergel, D. (1993). Beyond topical relevance: Document selection behavior of real users of IR systems. Proceedings of the 56th ASIS Annual Meeting, 30, 87-92.