Numerical absorbing boundary conditions for the scalar and vector wave equations

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 1015-1022

  Stupfel, B ^a   Mittra, R ^b  

^a CEA DIF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTENNA REFLECTORS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE REFLECTION; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE SCATTERING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHODS; VECTORS;

NUMERICAL ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; OPEN REGION PROBLEMS; SCALAR WAVE EQUATIONS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL HELMHOLTZ EQUATION; VECTOR WAVE EQUATIONS;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY;

EID: 0030192185     PISSN: 0018926X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/8.504310     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. A. Bayliss, M. Gunzburger, and E. TürkeiBoundary conditions for the numerical solution of elliptic equations in exterior regionsSIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 42,pp. 430-451.1982.
2. A. F. PetersonAbsorbing boundary conditions for the vector wave equationMicrowave Opt- Technoi Lett., vol. 1.pp. 62-64,1988.
3. J. P. Webb and V. N. KanellopoulosAbsorbing boundary conditions for the finite element solution of the vector wave equationMicrowave Opt. Technoi. Lett., vol. 2,pp. 370-372,1989.
4. G. MurAbsorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference approximation of the time domain electromagnetic field equationIEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. EMC-23.pp. 377-382,1981.
5. P. Joly and B. MercierUne nouvelle condition transparente d'ordre 2 pour Les équation de Maxwell en dimension 3 Rapport de lecherche n° 1047, INRIA, BP105,78135 I,e Chesnay, France, 1989.
6. B. StupfelAbsorbing boundary conditions on arbitrary boundaries for the scalar and vector wave equations. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 42,pp. 773-780,1994.
7. [7; K. K. Mei, R. Pous, Z. Chen. Y. W. Liu, and M. D. ProutyMeasured equation of invariance: A new concept in field computationsIEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 42,pp. 320-328,1994.
8. R. Gordon, R. Mittra. A. Ulisson. and E. MichielssenFinite element analysis of electromagnetic scattering by complex bodies using an efficient numerical boundary condition for mesh truncationElectron. Lett., vol. 29,pp. 1102-1103,1993.
9. R. Millra, A. Boag, and A. BoagA new look at the absorbing boundary condition issue for FEM mesh truncation in open region problems 2nd int. Workshop Finite Element Methods Electromagn. Wave Problems, COMPEL, Siena, Italy, May 1994, vol.13, sup. A, pp. 211-216.
10. A. Boag, A. Boag, R. Mittra. and Y. LeviatanA numerical absorbing boundary condition for finite-difference and finite-element analysis of open structures Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 395-398,1994.
11. A, Boag and R. MittraA numerical absorbing boundary condition for 3-D edge-based finite clement analysis of very low frequency fieldsMicrowave Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 9,pp. 22-27,1995.
12. B. Stupfel and R. MittraA theoretical study of numerical absorbing boundary conditions IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.. vol. 43, pp. 478187, 1995.
13. ]13] u. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Compulations. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univ. Press, 1989. pp. 592-599.