Federal information dissemination policies and practices: One perspective on managing the transition

Journal of Government Information

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 435-441

  Adler, Prudence S ^a  

^a ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Federal Depository Library Program FDLP; Government information, preservation; Information dissemination policies; Networked environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030191563     PISSN: 13520237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/1352-0237(96)00024-X     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1. Stakeholders include, but are not limited to, federal agencies, federal depository library program participants, members of the private sector including members of the information industry, users, and other information providers.
2. 2. Association of Research Libraries, ARL Fall Membership Meeting, October 1995 (forthcoming 1996) and http://arl.cni.org/Membership Meetings.
3. 3. ARL Fall Membership Meeting.
4. 4. Although this is not a new activity for agencies, the ability to publish independently has, due to the technologies, increased significantly. For a historical perspective, see John Spencer Walters, "'Toy' Presses and the Rise of Fugitive U.S. Government Documents," Journal of Government Information, 21, no. 5 (September/October 1994): 413-35.
5. 5. INS v. Chadha, 469 U.S. 919 (1983). See also, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, "Constitutionality of Proposed Regulations of Joint Committee on Printing Under Buckley V. Valeo and INS V. Chadha," Memorandum for Michael J. Horowitz, Counsel to the OMB Director, Re., April 11, 1984.
6. 5. INS v. Chadha, 469 U.S. 919 (1983). See also, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, "Constitutionality of Proposed Regulations of Joint Committee on Printing Under Buckley V. Valeo and INS V. Chadha," Memorandum for Michael J. Horowitz, Counsel to the OMB Director, Re., April 11, 1984.
7. 6. Al Gore, From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better & Costs Less (Washington, DC: GPO, 1993).
8. 7. U.S. Information Infrastructure Task Force, The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda for Action, (Washington, DC, September 15, 1993) and U.S. Office of Management and Budget, "Management of Federal Information Resources" (OMB Circular A-130) Federal Register 59, no. 141 (July 25, 1994): 37906.
9. 7. U.S. Information Infrastructure Task Force, The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda for Action, (Washington, DC, September 15, 1993) and U.S. Office of Management and Budget, "Management of Federal Information Resources" (OMB Circular A-130) Federal Register 59, no. 141 (July 25, 1994): 37906.
10. 8. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 13, 104th Cong., 1st sess. (May 22, 1995).
11. 9. Dupont Circle Group, "Dupont Circle Group Discussion Draft," April 26, 1993. Conference on the Future of Federal Government Information, "Reinventing Access to Federal Government Information," Chicago, IL, October 29-31, 1993, in Administrative Notes, 14, no. 24 (November 30, 1993): 11-29.
12. 10. The "Framework" appears as Appendix A in Betty J. Turock and Carol C. Henderson, "A Model for a New Approach to Federal Government Information Access and Dissemination," Journal of Government Information 23, no. 3 (May/June 1996): 227-40.
13. 11. Jutta Reed-Scott, Scholarship, Research Libraries, and Global Publishing (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, March 1996).
14. 12. Information on the following projects is based on a survey of ARL members, fall 1995. Results of the survey have not been published.
15. 13. National Research Council, Preserving Scientific Data on Our Physical Universe, A New Strategy for Archiving the Nation's Scientific Information Resources, (Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1995), 6.
16. 14. Preserving Scientific Data, 7.