Bayesian design of experiment for quantal responses: What is promised versus what is delivered

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 289-306

  Sun, Dongchu ^a   Tsutakawa, Robert K ^a   Lu, Wang Shu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

LD50; Logistic distribution; Monte Carlo integration; Posterior variance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030191357     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(95)00120-4     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Abdelbasit, K.M. and R.L. Plackett (1983). Experimental design for binary data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 78, 90-98.
2. Atkinson, A.C., K. Chaloner, A.M. Herzberg and J. Juritz (1983). Optimal experimental design for properties of a compartmental model. Biometrics 49, 325-337.
3. Chaloner, K. and K. Larntz (1989). Optimal Bayesian design applied to logistic regression experiments. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 21, 191-208.
4. Clyde, M.A. (1993). Optimal Bayesian design for approximate normality, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.
5. Finney, D.J. (1978). Statistical Method in Biological Assay, 3rd ed., Griffin, London.
6. Lehmann, E.L. (1983). Theory of Point Estimation. Wiley, New York.
7. Morgan, B.J.T. (1992). Analysis of Quantal Response Data. Chapman and Hall, London.
8. Tsutakawa, R.K. (1972). Design of experiment for bioassy. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 67, 584-590.
9. Tsutakawa, R.K. (1980). Selection of dose levels for estimating a percentage point of a logistic quantal response curve. Appl. Statist. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. C 29, 25-33.