Unsupervised segmentation of textured images

Information Sciences

Volumn 92, Issue 1-4, 1996, Pages 255-276

  Park, Jaehyun ^a   Kurz, Ludwik ^a  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; EDGE DETECTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEXTURES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE LIKE TECHNIQUE; CONDITIONAL AUTOREGRESSIVE EQUATIONS; HYPOTHESIS TEST; MARKOV RANDOM FIELDS; MINIMUM MEAN SQUARE ERROR; SECOND ORDER NONCAUSAL NEIGHBORHOOD; TEXTURED IMAGES; UNSUPERVISED SEGMENTATION ALGORITHM;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 0030189394     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0255(96)00047-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. M. Francos, A. Z. Meiri, and B. Porat, A unified texture model based on a 2-D Wold-like decomposition, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 41(8):2665-2678 (Aug. 1993).
2. A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
3. R. M. Haralick, Statistical and structural approaches to texture, Proc. IEEE 67 (May 1979).
4. G. G. Lendaris and G. L. Stanley, Diffraction pattern sampling for automatic pattern recognition, in Computer Methods in Image Analysis, Los Angeles: IEEE Computer Society, 1977.
5. R. P. Kruger, W. B. Thompson, and A. F. Turner, Computer diagnosis of Pneumoconiosis, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. SMC-4:40-49 (Jan. 1974).
6. D. B. Cooper, H. Elliot, F. S. Cohen, and P. F. Symosek, Stochastic boundary estimation and object recognition. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 326-355 (Apr. 1980).
7. F. S. Cohen and D. B. Cooper, Real-time texture image segmentation based on noncausal Markovian random field models, Proc. SPIE 449:17-28 (1984).
8. Z. Fan and F. Cohen, Textured image segmentation as a multiple hypothesis test, IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems 35:691-701 (June 1988).
9. H. Derin and H. Elliott, Modeling and segmentation of noisy and textured images using Gibbs random fields, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. PAMI-9:39-55 (Jan. 1987).
10. H. Elliot, H. Derin, R. Cristi, and D. Geman, Application of the Gibbs distribution to image segmentation, in Proc. 1984 Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, ICASSP'84, San Diego, CA, Mar. 1984, pp. 32.5.1-32.5.4.
11. F. S. Cohen and D. B. Cooper, Simple parallel hierarchical and relaxation algorithms for segmenting noncausal Markovian random fields, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. PAMI-9(2):195-219 (Mar. 1987).
12. S. Geman and C. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. PAMI-6:721-741 (Nov. 1984).
13. S. Lakshmanan and H. Derin, Simultaneous parameter estimation and segmentation of Gibbs random fields using simulated annealing, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 11(8):799-813 (Aug. 1989).
14. D. Stern and L. Kurz, Edge detection in correlated noise using Latin square masks, Pattern Recognition 2(2):119-129 (1988).
15. J. J. MacEachin, Analysis of variance in image processing of correlated data, Ph.D. dissertation, Polytechnic Univ., NY, 1986.
16. I. Kadar and L. Kurz, A class of robust edge detectors based on Latin squares, Pattern Recognition 11:329-339 (1979).
17. M. M. Benteftifa and L. Kurz, Two-dimensional object detection in correlated noise, Pattern Recognition 24:750-771 (1991).
18. S. H. Chang and L. Kurz, Object detection and experimental designs, Computer Graphics, Vision, and Image Processing 40:147-168 (1987).
19. R. Haberstroh and L. Kurz, Line detection in noisy and structured backgrounds using Graeco-Latin squares, CVGIP - Graphical Models and Image Processing 55(3):161-179 (1993).
20. B. Julesz, Experiments in the visual perception of texture, Scientific American 232:765-771 (June 1977).
21. J. W. Woods, Two-dimensional discrete Markovian fields, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-18:232-240 (Mar. 1972).
22. R. L. Kashyap, Random fields models on torus lattices for finite images, 1103-1105 (1980).
23. J. E. Besag, Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B B-36:192-236 (1974).
24. B. D. Ripley, Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1988.
25. R. L. Kashyap and R. Chellappa, Estimation and choice of neighbors in spatial-interaction models of images, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-29:60-72 (Jan. 1983).
26. J. E. Besag and P. A. P. Moran, On the estimation and testing of spatial interactions in Gaussian lattice processes, Biometrika 62:555-562 (1975).
27. J. E. Besag, Efficiency of pseudo-likelihood estimates for simple Gaussian fields, Biometrika 64:616-618 (1977).
28. S. Geman and C. Graffigne, Markov random field image models and their applications to computer vision, in Proc. Int. Congr. Math., A. M. Gleason, Ed., Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1987.
29. R. L. Kashyap, Characterization and estimation of two-dimensional ARMA models, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-30:736-745 (Sept. 1984).
30. C. R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1973.