Comparison of milk with serum ELISA for the detection of paratuberculosis in dairy cows

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Volumn 209, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 120-122

  Hardin, Laura Ellen ^a,b   Thorne, James Garrett ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM ANTIBODY;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEMALE; IMMUNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MILK; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, BACTERIAL; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEMALE; MILK; MISSOURI; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0030187182     PISSN: 00031488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Collins MT. Clinical approach to control of bovine paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;204:208-210.
2. Collins MT, Morgan IR. Economic decision analysis model of a paratuberculosis test and cull program. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;199:1724-1729.
3. Sanftleben P. Quest continues for fast, reliable test for bovine paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;197:299-305.
4. Collins MT, Sockett DC, Ridge S, et al. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Johne's disease. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:272-276.
5. Sockett DC, Conrad TA, Thomas CB, et al. Evaluation of four serological tests for bovine paratuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1134-1139.
6. Smith RD. Veterinary clinical epidemiology: a problem-oriented approach. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991;66.
7. Braun RK, Buergelt CD, Littell RC, et al. Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to estimate prevalence of paratuberculosis in cattle of Florida. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;196:1251-1254.
8. Collins MT, Sockett DC, Goodger WJ, et al. Herd prevalence and geographic distribution of, and risk factors for, bovine paratuberculosis in Wisconsin. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;204:636-641.
9. Chiodini RJ, Van Kruiningen HJ. The prevalence of paratuberculosis in culled New England cattle. Cornell Vet 1986;76:91-104.
10. Merkal RS, Whipple DL, Sacks JM, et al. Prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in ileocecal lymph nodes of cattle culled in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987;190:676-680.
11. Richards WD. Milk ELISA: a new inexpensive test for detecting paratuberculosis in dairy herds (Paratuberculosis Newslett). Proc Annu Meet US Anim Health Assoc 1990;2:7-8.
12. Sweeney RW, Whitlock RH, Buckley CL, et al. Diagnosis of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies against Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in milk. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:905-909.
13. Ridge SE, Morgan IR, Sockett DC, et al. Comparison of the Johne's absorbed EIA and the complement-fixation test for the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle. Aust Vet J 1991;68:253-257.