|
Volumn 76, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 97-101
|
A comparison of two methods of adhering composite to metal
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;
CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE;
COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN;
DENTACOLOR;
ION;
METAL;
METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
POLYFLUOROMETHACRYLATE;
POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
POLYURETHAN;
RESIN;
RESIN CEMENT;
SILANE DERIVATIVE;
WATER;
ADHESION;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTURE;
HUMAN;
HYDROLYSIS;
METHODOLOGY;
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
ACRYLIC RESINS;
ADHESIVENESS;
CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL;
CHROMIUM ALLOYS;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTURE DESIGN;
DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED;
DENTURE, PARTIAL, TEMPORARY;
HUMANS;
HYDROLYSIS;
IONS;
METALS;
METHACRYLATES;
POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS;
POLYURETHANES;
RESIN CEMENTS;
SILANES;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
WATER;
|
EID: 0030179902
PISSN: 00223913
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90349-2 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (10)
|