Comparisons of patient self-assessment of complete mandibular denture security

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 309-314

  Lamb, David J ^a,b   Bryan, Ellis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 0030179292     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kalk W, van Waas MAJ, Engels SEW. A comparison of different treatment strategies in patients with atrophic mandibles: A clinical evaluation after 6.5 years. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:277-283.
2. Jooste CH. The influence of the retromylohyoid extension on mandibular complete denture stability. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:34-38.
3. Bolender CL, Swoope CC, Smith DE. The Cornell Medical Index as a prognostic aid for complete denture patients. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:20-29.
4. van Waas MAJ, Kalk W, Engels SEW. Patients with atrophic mandibles: Opinions regarding the benefit of preprosthetic surgery. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:527-532.
5. Vervoorn JM, Duinkerke ASH, Luteijn F, van de Poel ACM. Assessment of denture satisfaction. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988;16:364-367.
6. Guckes AD, Smith DE, Swope CC. Counseling and related factors influencing satisfaction with dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:259-267.
7. Heyink JW, Heezen JH, Schaub RMH. Dentist and patient appraisal of complete dentures in a Dutch elderly population. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986;14:323-326.
8. Berg E. The influence of cusped and cuspless teeth on patient satisfaction with complete dentures. A 2-year follow-up study. J Dent 1988;16:269-276.
9. Aitken RCB. A growing edge of measurement of feelings. Proc Roy Soc Med 1969;62:989-993.
10. Hornblow AR, Kidson MA. The visual analogue scale for anxiety: A validation study. Aust New Zealand J Psychiatry 1976;10:339-341.
11. Seymour RA, Charlton JE, Phillips ME. An evaluation of dental pain using visual analogue scales and the McGill pain questionnaire. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41:643-648.
12. Lamb DJ, Ellis B. Patient-assessed security changes when replacing complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:145-151.
13. Lamb DJ, Ellis B, Kent C. Measurement of changes in complete mandibular denture security using visual analogue scales. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:30-34.
14. Hirsch B, Levin B, Tiber N. Effects of dentist authoritarianism on patient evaluation of dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:745-748.
15. Rees RG. Essential Statistics, ed 3. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995:11.
16. Lui WHD, Aitkenhead AR. Comparison of contemporaneous and retrospective assessment of postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale. Br J Anaesth 1991;67:768-771.
17. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods, ed 6. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1967:327,569.
18. Petrie A. Lecture Notes on Medical Statistics, ed 2. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1987:172.
19. Wilk MB, Ganadesikan R. Probability plotting method for the analysis of data. Biometricka 1965;55:1-17.
20. Caswell F, Success in Statistics. London: John Murray, 1992:118.
21. Kalk W, de Baat C. Patients' complaints and satisfaction 5 years after complete denture treatment. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990;18:27-31.
22. Lewis RV, Jackson PR, Ramsay LE. Side-effects of β-blockers assessed using visual analogue scales. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1985;28(suppl):93-96.