Factors Influencing the Outcome of Paramalleolar Bypass Grafts

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 356-360

  Plecha, E J ^b   Lee, C ^b   Hye, R J ^a  

^a UCSD MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLITEF;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOT; FORECASTING; GANGRENE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; ISCHEMIA; LEG ULCER; LIFE TABLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; RISK FACTOR; SAPHENOUS VEIN; SMOKING; SURVIVAL RATE; TIBIAL ARTERY; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOOT; FORECASTING; GANGRENE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; ISCHEMIA; LEG ULCER; LIFE TABLES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; RISK FACTORS; SAPHENOUS VEIN; SMOKING; SURVIVAL RATE; TIBIAL ARTERIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 0030179083     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02286779     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Pomposelli FB, Marcaccio EJ, Gibbons GW, et al. Dorsalis pedis arterial bypass: Durable limb salvage for foot ischemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:375-384.
2. Andros G, Harris RW, Salles-Cunha SX, et al. Bypass grafts to the ankle and foot. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:785-794.
3. Labbe R, Douville Y, Noel HP. Arterial reconstruction to the foot vessels: Is it worth the trouble? Can J Surg 1989;32:424-427.
4. Klamer TW, Lambert GE, Richardson JD, et al. Utility of inframalleolar arterial bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg 1990;11: 164-170.
5. Shah DM, Darling C, Chang BB, et al. Is long vein bypass from groin to ankle a durable procedure? An analysis of a ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:402-408.
6. Harrington EB, Harrington ME, Schanzer H, et al. The dorsalis pedis bypass - Moderate success in difficult situations. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:409-416.
7. Quiñones-Baldrich WJ, Colburn MD, Ahn SS, et al. Very distal bypass for salvage of the severely ischemic extremity. Am J Surg 1993;166:117-123.
8. Gloviczki P, Bower TC, Toomey BJ, et al. Microscope-aided pedal bypass is an effective and low-risk operation to salvage the ischemic foot. Am J Surg 1994;168:76-84.
9. Tannenbaum GA, Pomposelli FB, Marcaccio EJ, et al. Safety of vein bypass grafting to the dorsal pedal artery in diabetic patients with foot infections. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:982-990.
10. Plecha EJ, Seabrook GR, Bandyk DF, et al. Determinants of successful peroneal artery bypass. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:97-106.
11. Bernhard VM, Boren CH, Towne JB. Pneumatic tourniquet as a substitute for vascular clamps in distal bypass surgery. Surgery 1980;87:709-713.
12. Rutherford RB, Jones DN, Bergentz SE. Factors affecting the patency of infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 1988;8:236-246.
13. Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, et al. Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypasses during 1981 to 1989: Determinant factors of long-term patency. J Vasc Surg 1991;13: 137-149.
14. Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM. Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: Five-year results of a modern series. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:193-206.
15. Buchbinder D, Singh JK, Karmody AM, et al. Comparison of patency rate and structural changes of in situ and reversed vein arterial bypass. J Surg Res 1981;30:213-222.
16. Hurley JJ, Auer AI, Herschey FB, et al. Distal arterial reconstruction: Patency and limb salvage in diabetics. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:796-802.
17. Thomas JH, Steers JL, Keushkerian SM, et al. A comparison of diabetics and nondiabetics with threatened limb loss. Am J Surg 1988;156:481-483.
18. Ascer E, Veith FJ, Gupta SK, et al. Short vein grafts: A superior option for arterial reconstructions to poor or compromised outflow tracts? J Vasc Surg 1988;7:370-378.