The use of proton chemical shifts to define the solution structure of a dimeric peptide

Journal of Peptide Science

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 233-239

  Busetta, Bernard ^a,b   Picard, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b Laboratoire de Cristallographie   (France)

Author keywords

Chemical shift estimation; NMR; Restrained refinementPB 931 067

Indexed keywords

ARGIPRESSIN; DRUG DERIVATIVE; PEPTIDE; PROTON;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DIMERIZATION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RANDOMIZATION; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; SYNTHESIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARGININE VASOPRESSIN; DIMERIZATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTONS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 0030178411     PISSN: 10752617     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psc.67     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. K. Wüthrich (1989). Protein structure determination in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Science 243, 45-50.
2. T. F. Havel (1986). DISGEO. Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange no. 507 Indiana University.
3. P. Güntert, W. Braun and K. Wüthrich (1991). Efficient computation of three dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. J. Molec. Biol. 217, 517-530.
4. Y. Kim and J. H. Prestegard (1990). Refinement of the NMR structures for acyl carrier protein with scalar coupling data. Proteins: Struct., Funct. Genet. 8, 377-385.
5. D. A. Mierke, A. Geyer and H. Kessler (1994). Coupling constants and hydrogen bonds as experimental restraints in a distance geometry refinement protocol. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 44, 325-331.
6. E. Oldfield (1995). Chemical shifts and three-dimensional protein structures. J. Biomol. NMR 5, 217-225.
7. E. Kuszewski, A. M. Gronenborg and G. M. Clore (1995). The impact of direct refinement against proton chemical shifts of protein structure determination by NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 107, 293-297.
8. H. Rik: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. A Physical Chemical View. Longman, Scientific and Technical, Harlow, UK, 1986.
9. H. Osapay and D. A. Case (1991). A new analysis of proton chemical shifts in protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 13, 9436-9444.
10. I. Herranz, C. Gonzalez, M. Rico, J. L. Nieto, J. Santoro, M. A. Jimenz, M. Bruix, J. L. Neira and F. J. Blanco (1992). Peptide group chemical shift computation. Magn. Reson. Chem. 30, 1012-1018.
11. A. Pardi, G. Wagner and K. Wüthrich (1983). Protein conformation and proton nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. Eur. J. Biochem. 137, 445-454.
12. A. Bundi and K. Wüthrich (1979). 1H-NMR parameters of the common amino-acid residues measured in aqueous solutions of the linear tetrapeptldes H-Gly-Gly-X-Ala-OH. Biopolymers 18, 285-297.
13. A. De Marco (1977). pH dependence of internal references. J. Magn. Reson. 26, 527-528.
14. D. S. Wishart, B. D. Sykes and F. M. Richards (1991). Relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts and protein secondary structure. J. Molec. Biol. 222, 311-333.
15. A. T. Brünger (1992). X-PLOR, Version 2.1 Manual. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
16. F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, G. J. B. Williams, E. F. Meyer, M. D. Brice, R. Rodgers, O, Kennard, T. Schimanouchi and M. Tasuml (1977). The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Molec. Biol. 112, 535-542.
17. D. H. Dyson and P. E. Wright (1991). Defining solution conformations of small linear peptides. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 20, 519-531.