Process reliability and safety under uncertainties

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 52, Issue 3 SPEC. ISS., 1996, Pages 211-225

  Aldemir, Tunc ^a   Belhadj, Mohamed ^a   Dinca, Laurian ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEAR REACTORS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PERFORMANCE; PROCESS ENGINEERING; RANDOM PROCESSES;

DIRECT INTEGRATION; NUCLEAR REACTOR DYNAMICS; PREDICTED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE; PROCESS RELIABILITY; SYSTEM EQUATIONS; UNCERTAINTIES;

RELIABILITY THEORY;

EID: 0030172971     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00133-6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Belhadj, M., Hassan, M. & Aldemir, T., On the need for dynamic methodologies in risk and reliability studies. Reliab. Engng & System Safety, 38 (1992) 219-236.
2. March-Leuba, J., Caccuci, D.G. & Perez, R.B., Universality and aperiodic behavior in nuclear reactors. Nucl. Sci. Engng, 86 (1984) 401.
3. Baker, G. R. & Essenhigh, R. H., Bifurcation diagrams in combustion analysis. In Combustion Fundamentals & Applications, pp.253-258, The Ohio State University, 1992.
4. Rand, R. H. & Armbuster, D., Perturbation Methods, Bifurcation Theory and Computer Algebra, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.
5. Ruelle, D., Elements of Differentiable Dynamics and Bifurcation Theory, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, 1989.
6. Aldemir, T., Utilization of the cell-to-cell mapping technique to construct Markov failure models for process control systems. In Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, Vol. 2, (ed. G. Apostolakis), pp.1431-1436, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, 1991.
7. Belhadj, M. & Aldemir, T., Some computational improvements in process system reliability and safety analysis using dynamic methodologies. Reliab. Engng System Safety, 51 (1996) 1-1.
8. Stark, H. & Woods, J. W., Probability, Random Processes and Estimation Theory for Engineers, p.281, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1986.
9. Hassan, M. & Aldemir, T., A data base oriented dynamic methodology for the failure analysis of closed loop control systems in process plants. Reliab. Engng & System Safety, 27 (1990) 275-322.
10. Rizwan-uddin, Space-independent xenon oscillations revisited. Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 60 (1989) 343.
11. Tong, L. S., Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-Phase Flow, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1966.
12. Dinca, L. G. & Aldemir, T., Global analysis of non-linear dynamic systems using the cell-to-cell-mapping technique and parallel processing. Proc. Application of Parallel and Distributed Computing, The Ohio Supercomputer Center, Columbus, Ohio, 1994.
13. Belhadj, M., Probabilistic assessment of dynamic system performance. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University, 1993.
14. Myers, R. H., Response Surface Methodology, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, 1971.
15. Welstead, S.T., Neural network modeling of chaotic dynamics in nuclear reactor flows I. Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 65 (1992) 210.