Biotechnology and the utilitarian argument for patents

Social Philosophy and Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 113-144

  Svatos, Michele ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RECOMBINANT DNA;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ECONOMICS; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENE; GENETICS; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MOTIVATION; PATENT; POLICY; RESEARCH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE; SOCIAL CHANGE; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

AGRICULTURE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DNA, RECOMBINANT; ECONOMICS; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; GENES; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENETICS; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; MOTIVATION; ORGANISMS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PATENTS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE; SOCIAL CHANGE; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0030170826     PISSN: 02650525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0265052500003484     Document Type: Article

References (1)

1. William B. Lacy, Lawrence Bush, and William D. Cole, "Biotechnology and Agricultural Cooperatives: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for the Future," in Biotechnology: Assessing Social Impacts and Policy Implications, ed. David J. Webber (New York: Greenwood Press, 1990), p. 74.