University instructors' ratings profiles: Stability over time, and disciplinary differences

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 341-365

  Hativa, Nira ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030170643     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf01730121     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Belgard, M., Rosenshine, B., and Gage, N. L. (1971). Study I. Effectiveness in explaining: Evidence on its generality and correlation with pupil ratings. In I. Westbury and A. A. Bellack (eds.), Research into Classroom Processes: Recent Developments and Next Steps pp. 182-191. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Berk, R. A. (1989). The construction of rating instruments for faculty evaluation. Journal of Higher Education 50(5): 650-669.
3. Bernardin, H. J. (1977). Behavioral expectation scales versus summated scales: A fairer comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology 62: 422-427.
4. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject-matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195-203.
5. Borman, W. C. (1975). Effects of instructions to avoid halo error on reliability and validity of performance evaluation ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 60: 556-560.
6. Centra, J. A. (1979). Determining Faculty Effectiveness: Assessing Teaching, Research, and Service for Personnel Decisions and Improvements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't. Research in Higher Education 9(3): 199-242.
8. Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristic: A review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education 24(2): 139-213.
9. Gage, N. L., Belgard, M., Dell, D., Killer, J., Rosenshine, B., and Unruh, W. (1971). Explorations of the teacher's effectiveness in lecturing. In I. Westbury and A. A. Bellack (eds.), Research into Classroom Processes: Recent Developments and Next Steps, pp. 182-191. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Hanges, P. J., Schneider, B., and Niles, K. (1990). Stability of performance: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(6): 658-667.
12. Hativa, N. (1983). What makes mathematics lessons easy to follow, understand, and remember. College Mathematics Journal 14(5): 398-406.
13. Hativa, N. (1984). Good teaching of mathematics as perceived by undergraduate students. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 15(5): 605-615.
14. Hativa, N. (1985). A study of the organization and clarity of mathematics lessons. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 16(1): 89-99.
15. Hativa, N. (1995). The department-wide approach to improving faculty instruction in higher education: A qualitative evaluation. Research in Higher Education 36(4): 377-413.
16. Hativa, N., and Raviv, A. (1993). Using a single score for summative teacher evaluation by students. Research in Higher Education 34(5): 625-646.
17. Hiller, J. H., Fisher, G. A., and Kaess, W. A. (1969). A computer investigation of verbal characteristics of effective classroom lecturing. American Educational Research Journal 6(4): 661-675.
18. Levinson-Rose, J., and Menges, R. J. (1981). Improving college teaching: A critical review of research. Review of Educational Research 51(3): 403-434.
19. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(5): 707-754.
20. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11(3): 253-388.
21. Marsh, H. W., and Bailey, M. (1993). Multidimensionality of students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A profile analysis. Journal of Higher Education 64(1): 1-18.
22. Marsh, H. W., and Overall, J. U. (1979). Long-term stability of students' evaluations: A note on Feldman's "Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses." Research in Higher Education 10(2): 139-147.
23. Marsh, H. W., and Overall, J. U. (1981). The relative influence of course level, course type, and instructor on students' evaluations of college teaching. American Educational Research Journal 18(1): 103-112.
24. Marsh, H. W., and Roche, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 30(1): 217-251.
25. McBean, E. A., and Al-Nassri, S. (1982). Questionnaire design for student measurement of teaching effectiveness. Higher Education 11(3): 273-288.
26. Murray, H. G., Rushton, P., and Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2): 250-261.
27. Nelsen, E. A., and Ray, W. J. (1983). Observational ratings of teaching performance: Dimensionality and stability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles. ERIC ED 235-245.
28. Scriven, M. (1989). The design and use of forms for the student evaluation of teaching. Instructional Evaluation 10(1): 1-13.
29. Stevens, J. J., and Aleamoni, L. M. (1985). The use of evaluative feedback for instructional improvement: A longitudinal perspective. Instructional Science 13(4): 285-304.
30. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 25-29.
31. Williams, E. J. (1985). Research on teacher clarity. Teacher Education Quarterly 12(3): 33-38.