A comparison of time domain boundary conditions for acoustic waves in wave guides

Quarterly of Applied Mathematics

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 249-265

  Banks, H T ^a   Propst, G ^b   Silcox, R J ^c  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^c NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ACOUSTIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; ACOUSTIC WAVES; DUCTS; FREQUENCIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; WAVEGUIDES;

DUCT TERMINATION; REFLECTION COEFFICIENTS; TIME DOMAIN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; TIME DOMAIN MODELS;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

EID: 0030166718     PISSN: 0033569X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1090/qam/1388015     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. P. M. Morse and K. U. Ingard, Theoretical Acoustics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968
2. W. E. Zorunski and T. L. Parrott, Non-linear acoustic theory for rigid porous materials, NASA TN D-6196, June 1971
3. S. I. Hariharan and H. C. Lester, A finite difference solution for the propagation of sound in near sonic flows, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 75, 1052-1061 (1984)
4. J. S. Preisser, et al, Flight study of induced Turbofan inlet radiation with theoretical comparisons, AIAA J. of Aircraft 22, 57-62 (1985)
5. W. R. Watson and M. K. Myers, Numerical computation of steady state acoustic disturbances in flow, AIAA paper no. AIAA-92-02-074 presented at DGLR/AIAA 14th Aeroacoustics Conference, Aachen, FRG, May 11-14, 1992
6. K. R. Meadows and J. C. Hardin, Removal of spurious reflections from computational fluid dynamic solutions with the complex Cepstrum, AIAA Journal 30, 29-34 (1992)
7. B. Bolton and E. Gold, The determination of acoustic reflection coefficients by using spectral techniques, I: Experimental procedures and measurements of polyurethane foam, J. Sound Vibration 110, no. (2), 179-202 (1986)
8. J. T. Beale, Spectral properties of an acoustic boundary condition, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 25, 895-917 (1976)
9. J. T. Beale and S. I. Rosencrans, Acoustic boundary conditions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 80, 1276-1278 (1974)
10. A. Majda, Disappearing solutions for the dissipative wave equation, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 24, 1119-1133 (1975)
11. G. Chen, A note on the boundary stabilization of the wave equation, SIAM J. Control Optimization 19, 106-113 (1981)
12. H. T. Banks, S. L. Keeling, and R. J. Silcox, Optimal control techniques for active noise suppression, Proc. 27th Conf. on Decision and Control, Austin, TX. 1988, pp. 2006-2011
13. A. Majda, The location of the spectrum for the dissipative acoustic operator, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 25, 973-987 (1976)
14. J. Lagnese, Decay of solutions of wave equations in a bounded region with boundary dissipation, J. Differential Equations 50, 163-182 (1983)
15. D. L. Russell, Control theory of hyperbolic equations related to certain questions in harmonic analysis and spectral theory, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 40, 336-368 (1972)
16. H. T. Banks, G. Propst, and R. J. Silcox, Groups generated by wave-duct acoustics with impedance boundary conditions, CAMS Tech. Report #90-10, University of Southern California, August, 1990
17. M. G. Jones and T. L. Parrott, Evaluation of a multi-point method for determining acoustic impedance, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 3, no. (1), 15-35 (1989)
18. B. S. Garbow, K. E. Hillstrom, and J. J. More, Documentation for MINPACK subroutine LMDIF1, Argonne National Laboratory, 1980