Strength of preference and effects of valence in the domains of gains and losses

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 290-306

  Yamagishi, Kimihiko ^a  

^a SHUKUTOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030162341     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0057     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Banks, W. P., Clark, H. H., & Lucy, P. (1975). The locus of the Semantic Congruity Effect in comparative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 35-47.
2. Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (1992). The effect of the focus of comparison on consumer preference. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 430-440.
3. Dunning, D., & Parpal, M. (1989). Mental addition versus subtraction in counterfactual reasoning: On assessing the impact of personal actions and life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 5-15.
4. Fisher, G. W., & Hawkins, S. A. (1993). Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 580-597.
5. Houston, D. A., Sherman, S. J., & Baker, S. M. (1989). The influence of unique features and direction of comparison on preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 121-141.
6. Kahneman, D., Knetch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental Tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325-1348.
7. Kahneman, D., Knetch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206.
8. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
9. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. New York: Academic Press.
10. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
11. Lindman, H. R. (1971). Inconsistent preferences among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 390-397.
12. McGill, R., Tukey, J. W., & Larsen, W. A. (1978). Variations of box plots. The American Statistician, 32, 12-16.
13. Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546-556.
14. Shafir, E. B., Osherson, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1989). An advantage model of choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 1-23.
15. Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1988). Decision Making. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 673-738). New York: Wiley.
16. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
17. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384.
18. Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80, 204-217.
19. Yamagishi, K., & Miyamoto, J. M. (1996). Asymmetries in strength of preference: A focus shift model of valence effects in difference judgment, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22, 493-509.