Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: Model

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1178-1188

  Kayargadde, Vishwakumara ^a   Martens, Jean Bernard ^a  

^a Institute for Perception Research Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; VISION;

ARTIFACTS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030161663     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.13.001178     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. H. de Ridder and G. M. M. Majoor, “Numerical category scaling: an efficient method for assessing digital image coding impairments,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging: Models, Methods, and Applications, J. P. Allebach and B. E. Rogowitz, eds., Proc. SPIE 1249, 65–77 (1990).
2. J. A. J. Roufs, “Perceptual image quality: concept and measurement,” Philips J. Res. 47, 3562 (1992).
3. C. R. Carlson and R. W. Cohen, “A simple psychophysical model for predicting the visibility of displayed information,” Proc. Soc. Inf. Disp. 21, 229–246 (1980).
4. P. Barten, “The effects of picture size and definition on perceived image quality,” IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 36, 1865–1869 (1989).
5. P. G. J. Barten, “Evaluation of subjective image quality with the squareroot integral method,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 2024–2031 (1990).
6. J. Limb, “Distortion criteria of the human viewer,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC9, 779–793 (1979).
7. F. Lukas and Z. Budrikis, “Picture quality prediction based on a visual model,” IEEE Trans. Commun. COM 30, 1679–1692 (1982).
8. H. Marmolin, “Subjective MSE measures,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC16, 486–489 (1986).
9. C. Zetzsche and G. Hauske, “Multiple channel model for the prediction of subjective image quality,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE 1077, 209–216 (1989).
10. S. Daly, “Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE 1666, 215 (1992).
11. S. Daly, “Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993), pp. 179–206.
12. J. Lubin, “A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation,” in Visual Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, River Edge, N.J., 1995).
13. A. J. Ahumada, Jr. “Computational imagequality metrics: a review,” in SID 93 Digest (Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, Calif., 1993), pp. 305–308.
14. A. B. Watson, ed., Digital Images and Human Vision (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993).
15. R. Beaton, “Quantitative models of image quality,” In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1983), pp. 41–45.
16. H. Marmolin and S. Nyberg, “Multidimensional scaling of subjective image quality,” FOA Rep. C 30039H9 (Swedish National Defense Research Institute, Stockholm, 1975).
17. P. E. Green, F. J. Carmone, Jr. and S. M. Smith, Multidimensional Scaling, Concepts and Applications (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1989).
18. V. Kayargadde and J.B. Martens, “Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: experiments,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1166–1177 (1996).
19. T. Nakayama, M. Kurosu, K. Honjyo, and T. Nishimoto, “Evaluation and prediction of displayed image quality,” in SID 80 Digest (Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, Calif., 1980), pp. 180–181.
20. B. EscalanteRamirez, J.B. Martens, and H. de Ridder, “Multidimensional perceptual quality of noisereduced computedtomography images,” in Medical Imaging 1994: Image Perception, H. L. Kundel, ed., Proc. SPIE 2166, 119–130 (1994).
21. B. EscalanteRamirez, J.B. Martens, and H. de Ridder, “Multidimensional characterization of the perceptual quality of noisereduced computed tomography images,” J. Visual Commun. Image Representation 6, 317–334 (1995).
22. H. de Ridder, “Minkowskimetrics as a combination rule for digitalimagecoding impairments,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE 1666, 16–26 (1992).
23. J. H. D. M. Westerink and J. A. J. Roufs, “Subjective image quality as a function of viewing distance, resolution and picture size,” J. SMPTE 98, 113–119 (1989).
24. V. Kayargadde and J.B. Martens, “Estimation of perceived image blur using edge features,” Int. J. Imaging Syst. Tech nol. (to be published).
25. V. Kayargadde and J.B. Martens, “Estimation of noise variance and an objective measure for perceived noise,” Signal Process. (to be published).
26. R. W. G. Hunt, “Colour terminology,” Color Res. Appl. 3, 7987 (1978).
27. C. Poynton, “Gamma and its disguises: the nonlinear mappings of intensity in perception, CRTs, film and video,” J. SMPTE 102, 1099–1108 (1993).
28. M. Morgan, G. Mather, B. Moulden, and R. Watt, “Intensity response nonlinearities and the theory of edge localization,” Vision Res. 24, 713–719 (1984).
29. V. Kayargadde and J.B. Martens, “Estimation of edge parameters and image blur using polynomial transforms,” CVGIP Graphical Models Image Process. 56, 442–461 (1994).
30. J.B. Martens, “The Hermite transform—theory,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 38, 1595–1606 (1990).