The pen-based computer as an alternative platform for test administration

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 455-464

  Overton, Randall C ^b   Taylor, L Rogers ^b   Zickar, Michael J ^a   Harms, Harvey J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030161565     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01808.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. APA Committee on Professional Standards and Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment (1986). Guidelines for computer based tests and interpretations. Washington: American Psychological Association.
2. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Mead AD, Drasgow F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449-458.
4. Peterson NG, Rosse RL, Houston JS. (1982). The job effectiveness prediction system (Tech. Rep. No. 4: Validity analyses). Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.