Evolving ethical issues in selection of subjects for clinical research

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 334-345

  Weijer, Charles ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BELMONT REPORT; BENEFICENCE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS; NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STANDARD; TWENTIETH CENTURY; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BELMONT REPORT; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; TWENTIETH CENTURY;

ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; BENEFICENCE; CLINICAL TRIALS; CLINICAL TRIALS, PHASE II; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSONS; PREGNANCY; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 0030159221     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180100007155     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations [Trans GEM Anscombe]. Oxford, United Kingdom: Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1991:§103.
2. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. OPRR Reports 1979;April 18:1-8.
3. See note 2. National Commission. 1979;April 18:1-8.
4. See note 2. National Commission. 1979;April 18:1-8.
5. See note 2. National Commission. 1979;April 18:1-8.
6. See note 2. National Commission. 1979;April 18:1-8.
7. See note 2. National Commission. 1979;April 18:1-8.
8. See note 2. National Commission. 1979;April 18:1-8.
9. For a detailed discussion of the different formulations of distributive justice see: Beauchamp T. Distributive justice and morally relevant differences. In: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Appendix Volume I The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research [DHEW Publication (OS) 78-0013] Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1978:6.1-6.20.
10. See note 2. National Commission. 1979;April 18:1-8.
11. Levine C. Has AIDS changed the ethics of human subjects research? Journal of Law, Medicine and Health Care 1988;16:167-73.
12. Annas GJ, Grodin MA, Eds. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
13. Katz J. Experimentation With Human Beings. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972:9-65.
14. Katz J. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States-a personal odyssey. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Experimentation 1987;9:l-6.