Knowledge of binding in normal and SLI children

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 431-464

  Franks, Steven L ^a   Connell, Phil J ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; VIDEORECORDING;

CHILD; CHILD LANGUAGE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0030159183     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000900008874     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Berwick, R. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2. Borer, H. & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.
3. Chien, Y-C, & Wexler, K. (1990). Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1, 225-95.
4. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
5. _ (1986a). Knowledge of language : its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
6. _ (1986b). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. _ (1992). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.
8. Cole, P., Hermon, G. & Sung, M. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 1-22.
9. Connell, P. (1987). An effect of modeling and imitation teaching on children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 30, 105-13.
10. Connell, P. & Stone, C. A. (1992). Morpheme learning of children with specific language impairment under controlled instructional conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35, 844-52.
11. Crain, S. (1989). Why production precedes comprehension. Paper presented at the 14th Boston University Conference on Child Language Development. Boston, MA.
12. Grimshaw, J. & Rosen, S. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of Binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 187-222.
13. Hyams, N. (1987). The theory of parameters and syntactic development. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.
14. Hyams, N. & Sigurjónsdóttir, S. (1990a). A crosslinguistic comparison of the development of referentially dependent elements. Paper presented at the 15th Boston University Conference on Child Language Development, Boston, MA.
15. _,_ (1990b). The development of 'long-distance anaphors': a cross-linguistic comparison with special reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1, 57-93.
16. Kapur, S., Lust, B., Harbert, W. & Martohardjono, G. (1993). Universal grammar and learnability theory: the case of binding domains and the 'subset principle'. In E. Reuland & W. Abraham (eds), Knowledge and language : issues in representation and acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Katada, F. (1991). The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 287-313.
18. Kroch, A. (1989). Function and grammar in the history of English periphrastic do. In R. Fasold & D. Shiffrin (eds), Language change and variation. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
19. Leonard, L. (1982). The nature of specific language impairment in children. In S. Rosenberg (ed). Handbook of applied psycholinguistics : major thrusts of research and theory. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Lebeaux, D. (1983). A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 723-30.
21. Lightfoot, D. (1989). The child's trigger experience: Degree-o learnability. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 12, 321-34.
22. _ (1991). How to set parameters : arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
23. Matthei, E. (1981). Children's interpretation of sentences containing reciprocals. In S. Tavakolian (ed), Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. McDaniel, D. & Cairns, H. (1990). The child as an informant: eliciting linguistic intuitions from young children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19, 331-44.
25. McDaniel, D., Cairns, H. & Hsu, R. (1990a). Binding principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition I, 121-139.
26. McDaniel, D., Cairns, H. & Hsu, R. (1990b) Control principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition 1, 297-336.
27. Pica, P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
28. Pinker, S. (1990). Language acquisition. In D. Osherson & H. Lasnik (eds), An invitation to cognitive science: language (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
29. Progovac, L. (1992). Relativized SUBJECT, long-distance reflexives, and accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 23, 671-80.
30. Progovac, L. & Franks, S. (1992). Relativized SUBJECTS for reflexives. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
31. Read, C. & Hare, V. (1979). Children's interpretation of reflexive pronouns in English. In F. Eckman & A. Hastings (eds), Studies in first and second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. Roseberry, C. & Connell, P. (1991). Use of an invented language rule in the differentiation of normal and specific-language impaired Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 596-603.
33. Sigurjónsdóttir, S. & Hyams, N. (1991). The acquisition of binding in Icelandic. Paper presented at the 16th Boston University Conference on Child Language Development. Boston, MA.
34. _ & _ (1992). Reflexivization and logophoricity: evidence from the acquisition of Icelandic. Language Acquisition 2, 359-413.
35. Wexler, K. (1992). Some issues in the growth of control. In R. Larson et al. (eds), Control and grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. Wexler, K. & Chien, Y-C. (1987). Children's acquisition of the locality condition for reflexives and pronouns. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 24, 30-39.
37. Wexler, K. & Manzini, M. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.
38. White, L. (1981). The responsibility of grammatical theory to acquisition data. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (eds), Explanation in linguistics. London: Longman.
39. Yang, D-W. (1984). The extended binding theory of anaphors. Theoretical Linguistic Research 1, 195-218.