Differentiation of chicken breeds of different origin by polymorphic DNA markers

Genetika

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 795-803

  Semenova, S K ^a   Filenko, A L ^a   Vasil'Ev, V A ^a   Prosnyak, M I ^a   Sevast'Yanova, A A ^a   Ryskov, A P ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GENE BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CHICKEN; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; GENOME; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0030158870     PISSN: 00166758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Jeffreys A. J., Wilson V., Thein S.L. Hypervariable minisatellite"regions in human DNA // Nature (London). 1985. V. 314. P. 67-73.
2. RyskovA.P.,.IincharadzeA.G., ProsnyakM.I. étal. M13 phage DNA as a universal marker for DNA fingerprint of animals, plants and microorganisms // FEBS Letters. 1988. V. 233. P. 388-392.
3. Vassart G., Georges M., Monsier R. et al. A sequence in M13 phage detects hypervariable minisatellites in humen and animal DNA // Science. 1987. V. 235. P. 683-684.
4. Williams I.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livar K.I. et al. DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers // Nucl. Acid Res. 1990. V. 18. P. 6531-6535.
5. Welsh J., Petersen C., McCleland M. Polymorphisms generated by arbitrarily primed PCR in the mouse; Application to strain identification and genetic mapping // Nucl. Acid Res. 1991. V. 19. P. 303-306.
6. Botstein D., White R.L., Skolnick M. et al. Construction of a genetic map in using restriction fragment length polymorphism // Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1980. V. 32. P. 314-331.
7. Huberfeld A., Dunnington E.A., Siegel P.B. Genetic distances estimated from DNA fingerprints in crosses of White Plymouth Rock chikens // Anim. Genet. 1992. V. 23. P. 167-173.
8. Bumstead N., Palyga J. A preliminary linkage map of the chicken genome // Genomics. 1992. V. 13. P. 690-697.
9. Levin L, C rittenden L.B.,Dodson l.B. Genetic map of the chicken Z-chromosome using Random Amplified Polymorfic DNA (RAPD) markers //Genomics. 1993. V. 16. P. 224-230.
10. Levin L., Crittenden B., Dodson LB. Mapping DNA polymorphisms using PCR primers derived from the sequence of an avian CR1 element // J. Heredity. 1994. V. 85. P. 73-78.
11. Crittenden L.B., Provencher L., Santangeh L. et al. Characterization of a Red luhgl Fowl by White Leghorn reference population for molecular mapping of the chicken genome // Poultry. Science. 1993. V. 72. P. 334-348.
12. Kuhnlein U., Dawe Y., Zadworny D. et al. DNA fingerprinting: a tool for determining genetic distances between strains of poultry // Theor. Appl. Genet. 1989. V. 77. P. 669-672.
13. Hillel J., Plotzy Y., Haherfeld A. et al. DNA fingerprints of poultry // Anim. Genetics. 1989. V. 20. P. 145-155.
14. Dunnington E.A., Gal O., Siegel P.B. et al. Deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprint comparisons between selected populations of chickens // Poultry Science. 1991. V. 70. P. 463-467.
15. Siegel P.B., Mukherjee T.K., Stallard L.C. et al. Jungle fowl-domestic fowl relationships: A use of fingerprinting //Poultry. Science. 1992. V. 48. No 2. P. 147-155.
16. Mathew G.P. The isolation of high molecular weight eukaryotic DNA. Methods in Molecular Biology. V. 2 / Ed. Walker I.M. N.Y.: Humana Press, 1984. P. 31-34.
17. Prosnyak M.L, Veselovskaya S.I., Myasnikov V.A. et al. Substitution of 2- aminoadenine and 5-methylcytosine for adenine and cytosine in hybridization probes increases the sensitivity of DNA fingerprinting // Genomics. 1994. V. 21. P. 490-494.
18. Wetton I.H., Royston E.G., Parkin D.T. et al. Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting//Nature. 1987. V. 327. P. 147-149.
19. Kuhnlein U., Zadworny D., Dawe Y. étal. Assessment of inbreeding by DNA fingerprinting: Development of a calibration curve using defined strains of chickens // Ge' netics. 1990. V. 125. N° I. P. 161-165.
20. Hanotte O., Bruford M.W., Burke T. Multilocus DNA fingerprints in gallinaceous birds: approach and problems // Heredity. 1992. V. 68. P. 481-494.
21. Bruford M.W., Burke T. Minisatellite DNA markers in the chicken genome. I. Distribution and abudance of minisatellites in multilocus DNA fingerprints // Animal Genetics. 1994. V. 25. P. 381-389.
22. Ponsuksili S., Wimmers K., Valle-Zarate A. et al. Evaluation of genetic variation within different chicken lines by DNA fingerprinting // Proseed. 9th Europ. Poultry Conf., Glasgow 7-12th August 1994. P. 367-368.
23. Carlstm J.E., Tulsieram L.K., Glaubitz J.C. et al. Segregation of random amplified DNA markers in Fl progeny of conifers // Theor. Appl. Genetics. 1991. V. 83. P. 194-200.
24. Tinker N.A., Fortin M.G., Mather D.E. Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley // Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993. V. 85. P. 976-984.