Transit-based housing in the San Francisco Bay Area: Market profiles and rent premiums

Transportation Quarterly

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 33-49

  Cevero, Robert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (STANDARDS); MARKETING; PARKING; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; URBAN PLANNING; ZONING;

RAIL BASED PROJECTS; RENT PREMIUMS; TRANSIT BASED HOUSING;

HOUSING;

EID: 0030157135     PISSN: 02789434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bernick, M. 1993. The Bay Area's Emerging Transit-Based Housing. Urban Land Vol 52, No. 7, pp. 38-41.
2. Bernick, M. and R. Cervero. 1994. Transit-Based Development in the United States. Passenger Transport Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 7-8.
3. Burkhardt, R. 1976. Summary of Research: Joint Development Study. New York: Administration and Managerial Research Association.
4. Cervero, R. 1993. Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Development in California. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Monograph 45.
5. Cervero, R. 1994. Transit-based Housing in California: Evidence on Ridership Impacts. Transport Policy Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 174-183.
6. Cervero, R, M. Bernick, and G. Gilbert. 1993. Market Opportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Development in California. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working Paper 621.
7. Cervero, R. and V. Menotti. 1994. Market Profiles of Rail-Based Housing Projects in California. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working paper 622.
8. Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs. Metrorail Impacts on Washington, D.C. Land Values. Washington, D.C.: House of Representatives, U.S. Congress.
9. Dornbush, D. 1975. BART-Induced Changes in Property Values and Rents. Land Use and Urban Development Projects, Phase I, BART Impact Study. Berkeley: Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
10. Gatzlaff, D. and M. Smith. 1993. The Impact of the Miami Metrorail on the Value of Residences Near Station Locations. Land Economics Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 54-66.
11. Holtzclaw, J. 1994. Residential Patterns and Transit, Auto Dependence, and Costs. San Francisco: Resources Defense Council.
12. Landis, J., S. Guhathakurta, and M. Zhang. 1994. Capitalization of Transportation Investments into Single-Family Home Prices. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working Paper 619.
13. McCloud, J. 1992. High-Density Housing Near San Francisco: Builder Betting Proximity to Commute Lind. New York Times Vol. 141, Section 1, July 5, p. 23.
14. Pushkarev, B. and J. Zupan. 1977. Public Transportation and Land Use. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15. Rodenborn, S. and C. Purvis. 1991. 1990 Bay Area Travel Surveys: Data Collection and Data Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Paper presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
16. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economics Vol. 82, pp. 34-55.
17. Simonds, J. 1994. Garden Cities 21: Creating a Livable Urban Environment New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Untermann, R. 1984. Accommodating the Pedestrian: Adapting Towns and Neighborhoods for Walking and Bicycling. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
19. Voith, R. 1991. Transportation, Sorting and House Values. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 117-137.
20. Voith, R. 1993. Changing Capitalization of CBD-Oriented Transportation Systems: Evidence from Philadelphia, 1970-1988. Journal of Urban Economics Vol. 33, pp. 361-376.
21. Wilson, R. 1995. Suburban Parking Requirements: A Tacit Policy for Automobile Use and Sprawl. Journal of the American Planning Association Vol. 61, No. 1 (forthcoming).