Interactive semantic analysis of technical texts

Computational Intelligence

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 273-306

  Delisle, Sylvain ^a   Barker, Ken ^b   Copek, Terry ^b   Szpakowicz, Stan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Case analysis; Knowledge acquisition; Parsing; Semantic analysis; Semantic networks; Text analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES;

INTERACTIVE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; PRECODED DOMAIN SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE; PUBLIC DOMAIN GENERIC LINGUISTIC INFORMATION SOURCES; SEMANTIC NETWORKS; TECHNICAL TEXT; TEXT ANALYSIS FOR KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION PROJECT (TANKA); TEXT PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

EID: 0030148850     PISSN: 08247935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.1996.tb00263.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. ALIPRANDI, G., and G. SAVIOZZ. 1993. "A supervised learning method to solve PP-attachment ambiguities in natural language. In Proc. ECML Workshop on Machine Learning and Text Analysis Workshop, pp. 45-52.
2. BARKER, K. 1994. Clause-level relationship analysis in the TANKA system. TR-94-07, Computer Science Department, University of Ottawa.
3. BARKER, K., T. COPECK, S. DELISLE, and S. SZPAKOWICZ. 1993. An empirically grounded case system. TR-93-08, Computer Science Department, University of Ottawa.
4. BASILI, R., M. T. PAZIENZA, and P. VELARDI. 1992. Computational lexicons: the neat examples and the odd exemplars. In Proc. of 3rd Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 96-103.
5. BATEMAN, J. A., R. T. KASPER, J. D. MOORE, and R. A. WHITNEY. 1990. A general organization of knowledge for natural language processing: the penman upper model. TR, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA.
6. BLANCHON, H. 1992. A solution to the problem of interactive disambiguation. In Proc. COLING-92, pp. 1233-1238.
7. BRENT, M. R. 1991a. Automatic acquisition of subcategorization frames from untagged text. In Proc. 29th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 209-214.
8. th Conf. of the European Chapter of the ACL, pp. 222-226.
9. BROWN, R. D., and S. NIRENBURG. 1990. Human-computer interaction for semantic disambiguation. In Proc. COLING-90, pp. 42-47.
10. BRUCE, B. 1975. Case systems for natural language. Artificial Intelligence 6(4):293-326.
11. CARDIE, C. 1993. A case-based approach to knowledge acquisition for domain-specific sentence analysis. In Proc. AAAI-93, pp. 798-803.
12. CELCE-MURCIA, M. 1975. Verb paradigms for sentence recognition. American Journal for Computational Linguistics, microfiche 38.
13. CIRAVEGNA, F., P. CAMPIA, and A. COLOGNESE. 1992. Knowledge extraction from texts by SINTESI. In Proc. COLING-92, pp. 1244-1248.
14. COHEN, W. W. 1990. Learning from textbook knowledge: a case study. In Proc. AAAI-90, pp. 743-748.
15. COOK, W. A. 1979. Case grammar: development of the matrix model (1970-1978). Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
16. COPECK, T., S DELISLE, and S. SZPAKOWICZ. 1992. Parsing and case analysis in TANKA. In Proc. COLING-92, pp. 1008-1012.
17. DEJONG, G. 1982. Automatic schema acquisition in a natural language environment. In Proc. AAAI-82, pp. 410-413.
18. DELISLE, S. 1990. Arguments non-réalisés syntaxiquement: une analyse pour la compréhension automatisée du langage. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa, 19, pp. 1-27.
19. DELISLE, S. 1994. Text processing without a - priori domain knowledge: semi-automatic linguistic analysis for incremental knowledge acquisition. Ph.D. thesis, TR-94-02, Department of Computer Science, University of Ottawa, January 1994.
20. th Int. Conf. on Symbolic and Logical Computing, pp. 169-183.
21. DELISLE, S., T. COPECK, S. SZPAKOWICZ, and K. BARKER. 1993. Pattern matching for case analysis: a computational definition of closeness. Edited by O. Abou-Rabia, C. K. Chang, and W. W. Koczkodaj. In Proc. ICCI-93, pp. 310-315.
22. th Canadian Conf on AI, pp. 9-16.
23. DEROSE, S. J. 1988. Grammatical category disambiguation by statistical optimization. Computational Linguistics, 14(1);31-39.
24. DICK, J. P. 1992. A conceptual, case-relation representation of text for intelligent retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, TR CSRI-265, Computer Systems Research Institute, University of Toronto.
25. DIETTERICH, T. G. 1989. Machine learning. Annual Review of Computer Science, 4(1989-1990):255-306.
26. th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 120-127.
27. st Conf. of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5-14.
28. FASS, D. 1989. Some connections between knowledge representation and natural language description. TR-89-05, CSS/LCCR, Simon Fraser University.
29. FILLMORE, C. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory. Edited by E. Bach and R. T. Harms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
30. th AAA Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based System, pp. 8.1-8.16.
31. th AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 15.1-15.18.
32. GRIMES, J. 1975. The thread of discourse. Mouton.
33. GRISHMAN, R., and J. STERLING. 1992. Acquisition of selectional patterns. In Proc. COLING-92, pp. 658-664.
34. HAUPTMANN, A. G. 1993. Meaning from structure in natural language interfaces. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, Camegie-Mellon University.
35. JACOBS, P. S. 1992. Joining statistics with NLP for text categorization. In Proc. 3rd Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 178-185.
36. KAPLAN, R. M. 1989. Acquiring knowledge from text using multiple methodologies to accomplish text understanding. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Temple University.
37. KIM, J.-T., and D. I. MOLDOVAN. 1993. Acquisition of semantic patterns for information extraction from corpora. In Proc. 9th IEEE Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications, pp. 171-176.
38. nd Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 49-57.
39. LARSON, M. 1984. Meaning-based translation: a guide to cross-language equivalence. University Press of America, Lanham, MD.
40. st Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 243-250.
41. LOEWEN, V. 1988. ORDINOTRAD: a machine translation system based on case grammar. M.A. thesis, School of Translators and Interpreters, University of Ottawa.
42. MATWIN, S., and S. SZPAKOWICZ. 1992. Machine learning techniques in knowledge acquisition from text. THINK, 1(2):37-50.
43. st Conf. of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 33-42.
44. MILLER, G. A. Editor. 1990. WordNet: an on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4).
45. MONTEMAGNI, S., and L. VANDERWENDE. 1992. Structural patterns vs. string patterns for extracting semantic information from dictionaries. In Proc. COLING-92, pp. 546-552.
46. MOONEY, R. J. 1990. A general explanation-based learning mechanism and its application to narrative understanding. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
47. MOULIN, B., and D. ROUSSEAU. 1992. Automated knowledge acquisition from regulatory texts. IEEE Expert, October 1992, pp. 27-35.
48. NIRENBURG, S., and V. RASKIN. 1987. The subworld concept lexicon and the lexicon management system. Computational Linguistics, 13(3-4):276-289.
49. POWERS, D. M., and C. R. TURK. 1989. Machine learning of natural language. Springer-Verlag, New York.
50. QUIRK, R., S. GREENBAUM, G. LEECH, and J. SVARTVIK. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the english language. Longman.
51. th AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 27.1-27.16.
52. RILOFF, E. 1993. Automatically constructing a dictionary for information extraction tasks. In Proc. AAAI-93, pp. 811-816.
53. RINALDO, F. J. 1989. Deriving rules for medical expert systems using natural language parsing and discourse analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Illinois Institute of Technology.
54. ROUSSELOT, F., B. MIGAULT, and P. IGOT. 1992. Elaboration de techniques d'analyse adaptées à la construction d'une base de connaissances. In Proc. COLING-92, pp. 483-489.
55. SAGER, N. 1981. Natural language information processing: a computer grammar of english and its applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
56. th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 279-284.
57. SMADJA, F., and K. MCKEOWN. 1991. Using collocations for language generation. Computational Intelligence 7(4):229-239.
58. SOMERS, H. L. 1987. Valency and case in computational linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
59. SPARCK JONES, K., and B. K. BOGURAEV. 1987. A note on the study of cases. Computational Linguistics 13(1-2):65-68.
60. th Int. Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 321-328.
61. WEIZENBAUM, J. 1967. Contextual understanding by computers. Communications of the ACM, 10(8):474-480.
62. s1 Conf. of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 323-332.
63. th Int. Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 191-202.
64. YANG, L., and S. SZPAKOWICZ. 1991b. Planning in conceptual networks. In Proc. ICCI-91: Advances in Computing and Information. Edited by F. Dehne, F. Fiala, and W. W. Koczkodaj. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 669-671.
65. YANG, L., and S. SZPAKOWICZ. 1994. Path-finding in networks. In Proc. ICCI-94.
66. ZELLE, J. M., and R. MOONEY. 1993. ILP techniques for learning semantic grammars. In Proc. IJCAI Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, pp. 83-92.
67. ZERNIK, U. 1992. Shipping department vs. shipping pacemakers: using thematic analysis to improve tagging accuracy. In Proc. AAAI-92, pp. 335-342.
68. ZERNIK, U., and P. S. JACOBS. 1990. Tagging for learning: collecting thematic relations from corpus. In Proc. COLING-90, pp. 34-39.