Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in dogs

Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 133-138

  Chandler, Marjorie L ^a   Guilford, W Grant ^a   Lawoko, Charles R O ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; NITROGEN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BODY WEIGHT; BREATH ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIGESTIVE FUNCTION; DOG; ENTERIC FEEDING; FECES; FEMALE; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; BREATH TESTS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY; DOGS; ENTERAL NUTRITION; FECES; FEMALE; HYDROGEN; MALE; NITROGEN;

EID: 0030144121     PISSN: 08916640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02045.x     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Jones BJM. Enteral feeding: Techniques of administration. Gut 1986;27:46-50.
2. Hiebert JM, Brown A, Anderson RG, et al. Comparison of continuous vs intermittent tube feedings in adult burn patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1981;5:73-75.
3. Silk DBA, Paynes-James JJ: Complications of enteral nutrition. In: Rombeau JL, Caldwell MD, eds. Clinical Nutrition Enteral and Tube Feeding, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990.
4. Campbell IT, Morton RP, MacDonald IA, et al. Comparison of the metabolic effects of continuous postoperative enteral feeding and feeding at night only. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:1107-1112.
5. Coben RM, Weintraub A, DiMarino AJ, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux during gastrostomy feeding. Gastroenterology 1994;106: 13-18.
6. Ciocon JO, Galindo-Ciocon DJ, Tiessen C, et al. Continuous compared with intermittent tube feeding in the elderly. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992;16:525-528.
7. Kocan MJ, Hickisch SM: A comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral in NICU patients. J Neurosci Nurs 1986;18:333-337.
8. Broom J, Jones K: Causes and prevention of diarrhea in patients receiving enteral nutritional support. J Hum Nutr 1981;35: 123-127.
9. Bastow MD: Complications of enteral nutrition. Gut 1986;27:51-55.
10. Keohane PP, Attrill H, Love M, et al. Relation between osmolality of diet and gastrointestinal side effects in enteral nutrition. BMJ 1984;288:678-680.
11. Heymsfield SB, Hill JO, Evert M, et al. Energy expenditure during continuous intragastric infusion of fuel. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;45:526-533.
12. Heymsfield SB, Casper K, Grossman GD: Bioenergetic and metabolic response to continuous v intermittent nasogastric feeding. Metabolism 1987;36:570-575.
13. Grant J, and Denne SC: Effect of intermittent versus continuous enteral feeding on energy expenditure in premature infants. J Pediatr 1991;118:928-932.
14. Nacht CA, Schutz Y, Vernet O, et al. Continuous versus single bolus enteral nutrition: Comparison of energy metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol 1986;251 (Endocrinol Metab 14):E524-E529.
15. Garrel DR, deJonge L. Intragastric vs oral feeding:effect on the thermogenic response to feeding in lean and obese subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59:971-974.
16. Trocki O, Mochizuki H, Dominioni L, et al. Comparison of continuous and intermittent tube feedings in burned animals. J Burn Care Rehabil 1986;7:130-137.
17. Diamond P, Brondel L, LeBlanc J: Palatability and postprandial thermogenesis in dogs. Am J Physiol 1985;248 (Endocrinol Metab 11):E75-E79.
18. LeBlanc J, Cabanac M, Samson P: Reduced postprandial heat production with gavage as compared with meal feeding in human subjects. Am J Physiol 1984;246 (Endocrinol Metab 9):E95-E101.
19. deJonge L, Agoues I, Garrel DR. Decreased thermogenic response to food with intragastric vs oral feeding. Am J Physiol 1991;260 (Endocrinol Metab) (2 Pt 1):E238-E242.
20. Grant J, Denne SC. Effect of intermittent versus continuous enteral feeding on energy expenditure in premature infants. J Pediatr 1991;118:928-932.
21. Campbell IT, Morton RP, Cole JA, et al. A comparison of the effects of intermittent and continuous nasogastric feeding on the oxygen consumption and nitrogen balance of patients after major head and neck surgery. Am J Clin Nutr 1983;38:870-878.
22. Parker P, Stroop S, Greene H: A controlled comparison of continuous versus intermittent feeding in the treatment of infants with intestinal disease. J Pediatr 1981;99:360-364.
23. Pinchcofsky-Devin GD, Kaminski MV: Visceral protein increase associated with interrupted versus continuous enteral hyperalimentation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1985;9:474-476.
24. Wadhwa PS, Young E, Schmidt K, et al. Metabolic consequences of feeding frequency in man. Am J Clin Nutr 1973;26:823-830.
25. Fabry P, Fodor J, Hejl Z, et al. The frequency of meals: Its relation to overweight, hyper-cholesterolaemia, and decreased glucose-tolerance. Lancet 1964;614-615.
26. Armsrong PJ, Hardie EH: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A retrospective study of 54 clinical cases in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 1990;4:202-206.
27. Crowe DT: Nutritional support for the hospitalized patient: An introduction to tube feeding. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1990;12:1710-1721.
28. Donoghue S: Nutritional support of hospitalized animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;200:612-615.
29. Grauer GF: Veterinary clinical osmometry. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983;15:539-544.
30. Dallosso HM, Murgatroyd WPT, James PT: Feeding frequency and energy balance in adult males. Clin Nutr 1982;36C:25-39.