Comparison of two antibarking collars for treatment of nuisance barking

Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 231-235

  Juarbe Diaz, Soraya V ^a   Houpt, Katherine A ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANIS FAMILIARIS; CITRONELLA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPULSION; CONSUMER; DOG; INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DOGS;

EID: 0030141087     PISSN: 05872871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5326/15473317-32-3-231     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Beaver BV. Owner complaints about canine behavior. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;204:1953-5.
2. Campbell WE The prevalence of behavioral problems in American dogs Mod Vet Pract 1986;67.28-31
3. Adams GJ, Clark WT The prevalence of behavioural problems in domestic dog, a survey of 105 dog owners. Aust Vet Pract 1989;19:135-7.
4. Anonymous Electronic shock collars: the aftershock. Cornell Animal Health Newsletter 1995;13(4):1-2.
5. Adams GJ, Johnson KG. Behavioural responses to barking and other auditory stimuli during night-time sleeping and waking in the domestic dog (Canis fanuliaris). Appl Anim Behav Sci 1994;39:151-62.
6. Alvord LS. Annoyance factors for common neighborhood stationary noise J Acoust Soc Am 1988;84(2):780-1