A theory-based measure of coping strategies used by teachers: The problems in teaching scale

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 315-325

  Green, Samuel B ^a   Ross, Margaret E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030141040     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0742-051X(95)00041-H     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Blase, J. J. (1986). A qualitative analysis of sources of teacher stress: Consequences for performance. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 13-40.
2. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
3. Comrey, A. L. (1962). The minimum residual method of factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 11, 15-18.
4. Cox, T. & Brockley, T. (1984). The experience and effects of stress in teachers. British Educational Research Journal, 10, 83-87.
5. Dewe, P. J. (1985). Coping with work stress: An investigation of teachers' action. Research in Education, 33, 27-40.
6. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854.
7. Farber, B. A. (1984). Stress and burnout in suburban teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 325-331.
8. Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839-852.
9. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.
10. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992-1003.
11. Harman, H. H., & Jones, W. H. (1966). Factor analysis by minimizing residuals (Minres). Psychometrika, 31, 351-368.
12. Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527-535.
13. Kyriacou, C. (1980). Stress, health, and school-teachers: A comparison with other professions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 10, 154-159.
14. Kyriacou, C. (1987). Teacher stress and burnout: An international review. Educational Research, 29, 146-152.
15. Kyriacou, C., & Sutcliffe, J. (1979). Teacher stress and satisfaction. Educational Research, 21, 89-96.
16. Lazarus, R. S. (1983). The costs and benefits of denial. In S. Breznitz (Ed.), Denial of stress (pp. 1-30). New York: International Universities Press.
17. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
18. Markham, P., Green, S. B., & Ross, M. E. (1995) Identification of stressors and coping strategies of ESL/bilingual, special education, and regular education teachers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
20. Nerell, G., & Wahlund, I. (1981). Stressors and strain in white collar workers. In L. Levi (Ed.), Society, stress, and disease. Volume 4, Working life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Norušis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for windows professional statistics. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
22. Pratt, J. (1978). Perceived stress among teachers: The effects of age and background of children taught. Educational Review, 30, 3-14.
23. Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986) Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41, 813-819.
24. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., & Ellis, A. P. (1994). Coping through emotional approach: Problems of conceptualization and confounding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 350-362.
25. Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1985) The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 4, 249-288