Shear bond strength of four dentinal adhesives applied in vivo and in vitro

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 217-222

  Mason, P M ^a   Ferrari, Marco ^a   Cagidiaco, M C ^a   Davidson, C L ^a  

^a NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dentine bonding; In vivo bond strength

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; ALL BOND SYSTEM; ALL-BOND SYSTEM; CLEARFIL LINERBOND SYSTEM; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OPTIBOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADHESIVES; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0030140375     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(94)00011-5     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Tyler M, Charbenau G, Dennison J, Heys D, Fitzgerald M. In vivo and in vitro tensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 112 (spec issue abstr 48).
2. Gray S, Burgess J. In vivo and in vitro comparison of dentin bonding agents. J Dent Res 1980; 72: 381 (abstr 1547).
3. Pashley EL, Tao L, Merckert JR, Pashley DH. Comparison of in vivo vs in vitro bonding of composite resin to the dentin of canine teeth. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 467-470.
4. Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 19-22.
5. Stewart BL, Harcourt JK, Tyas MJ. Determination of adhesive bond strength to dentine. A new method. Aust Dent J. 1990; 35: 454-458.
6. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 127-129.
7. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 32: 39-41.
8. Swift EJ, Triolo PT. Bond strengths of Scotchbond Multi Purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 318-320.
9. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Wefel JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 44-55.
10. Michen J, Gronas D. Effects of time after extraction and depths of dentine on resin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 113: 285-287.
11. Causton BE. In vitro assessment of dentin bonding agents. Today's Dentist (Spec Iss) 1987; 3: 18-27.
12. Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 889-883.
13. Tam LE, Pillar RH. Fracture toughness of dentin-resin composite adhesive interfaces. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 953-959.
14. Finger JW. Dentine bonding agents. Relevance of in vitro investigatons. Am J Dent 1988; 1: 184-188 (spec issue)
15. Söderholm K-JM . Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD 156 Task Group on Test Methods for the adhesion of restorative materials. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 74-83.
16. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 66: 777-781.
17. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 777-781.
18. Nordenvall KJ, Brännström M. In vivo resin impregnation of dentinal tubules. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 630-636.
19. Pashley DH, Tao L, Derkson G. Dentin permeability and bond strengths after various surface treatments. Dent Mater 1980; 5: 375-379.
20. Tao L, Pashley DH. The relationship between dentin bond strengths and dentin permeability. Dent Mater 1980; 5: 133-139.
21. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent 1984; 9: 13-29.
22. Suzuki T, Finger WJ. The relationship between dentin bond strengths and dentin permeability. Dent Mater 1988; 5: 133-139.
23. Paul SJ, Schärer P. Intrapulpal pressure and thermal cycling effect on shear bond strength of eleven modern dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1993; 93: 179-185.
24. Prati C, Pashley DH, Montanari G. Hydrostatic pulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 54-58.
25. Davidson CL, Abdalla AL, De Gee AJ. An investigation into the quality of dentin bonding systems for accomplishing a durable bond. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 291-300.
26. Kashiwada T. In vivo bond strength of a new dental adhesive to dentin. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 381 (IADR abstr 222).
27. Mason PN, Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC. Shear bond strength of four dentinal adhesives: an in vivo investigation. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 198 (spec issue abstr 776).
28. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Ikeda W, Wu J. Bonding of 4-META/MNA-TBB resin to vital human dentin. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 199 (spec issue abstr 780).
29. Jacobsen T, Finger WJ. Morphology of coupling sites between bonding agents and dentine in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 1993; 21: 150-157.
30. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Mason PN. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with five different dentin adhesive systems tested in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 74: 444-448.
31. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Gesi A Balleri P. A preliminary report of an experimental design for in vivo testing of bonded restorations applied to a new enamel-dentinal bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 465-467.
32. Ferrari M, Yamamoto K. Vichi A, Finger WJ. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive retorative systems. Am J Dent 1994; 4: 217-219.
33. Jamil M, Aboush YEY, Elderton RJ. Bond strengths of dentine bonding agents to dentine. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 344-347.
34. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1993; 21: 158-162.