A commercially available cell culture device modified for dentin barrier tests

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 249-252

  Schmalz, Gottfried ^a   Garhammer, Pauline ^a   Schweiki, Helmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC FIL; KETAC-FIL; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; TOOTH CEMENT; VITRABOND; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DENTIN; DIFFUSION CHAMBER; DRUG EFFECT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HARVARD CEMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; L CELL; MOUSE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; TOOTH PULP; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL SURVIVAL; CERMET CEMENTS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PULP; DENTIN; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DIFFUSION CHAMBERS, CULTURE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; L CELLS (CELL LINE); MALEATES; MICE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOXICITY TESTS; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0030140335     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80142-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Meryon SD. The model cavity method incorporating dentine. Int Endod J 1988;21:79-84.
2. Hume WR. A new technique for screening chemical toxicity to the pulp from dental restorative materials and procedures. J Dent Res 1985;64:1322-5.
3. Hanks CT, Craig RG, Diehl ML, Pashley DH. Cytotoxicity of dental composites and other materials in a new in vitro device. J Oral Pathol Med 1988;17:396-403.
4. Hanks CT, Diehl ML, Makinen PL, Pashley DH: Characterisation of the "in vitro pulp chamber" using the cytotoxicity of phenol. J Oral Pathol 1989; 18:97-107.
5. Schmalz G, Schweikl H. Characterization of an in vitro dentin barrier test using a standard toxicant. J Endodon 1994;20:592-4.
6. Minuth WW, Rudolph U. A compatible support system of cell culture in biomedical research. Cyto Technol 1990;4:181-9.
7. Autian J, Dillingham ED. Overview of general toxicity testing with emphasis on special tissue culture tests. In: Berky J, Sherrod C, eds. In vitro toxicity testing 1975/1976. Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press, 1978.
8. Schmalz G, Esch J. Influence of dentin pretreatment upon barrier test results [Abstract 113]. J Dent Res 1994;73:953.
9. Miller RG. Simultaneous statistical interference. New York: Springer, 1981.
10. Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Dörter-Aslan F. New developments in the filter test system for cytotoxicity testing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1994;5:43-51.
11. Schmalz G, Schmalz C, Rotgans J. Die Pulpaverträglichkeit eines Glasionomer- und Zinkoxidphosphat-Zementes. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1986;41: 806-12.
12. Peltola M, Salo T, Oikarinen K. Toxic effects of various retrograde root filling materials on gingival fibroblasts and rat sarcoma cells. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992;8:120-4.
13. Schmalz G, Thonemann B, Riedel A, Elderton RJ. Biological and clinical investigations of a glass ionomer base material. Dent Mater (in press).
14. Osborne JW, Berry TG. Clinical assessment of glass ionomer cements as class 111 restorations. A 1 year report. Dent Mater 1986;2:147-50.
15. Camarillo G, Mascres C. La biocompatibilité des matériaux dentaire. Choix d'une méthode à tester: Faire ou ne pas faire. J Dent Québec 1991; 28:201-6.
16. Dogon LL, Van Leeuwen MJ, Heeley JD. Biological investigation of a new light cured glass ionomer restorative material [Abstract 1653]. J Dent Res 1992;71:312.
17. Meryon SD, Riches DWH. A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of four restorative materials assessed by changes in enzyme levels in two cell types. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:519-28.
18. Stanley HR, Going RE, Chauncey HH. Human pulp response to acid pretreatment of dentin and to composite restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91:817-25.
19. Meryon SD. The influence of surface area on the in vitro cytotoxicity of a range of dental materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1179-6.