|
Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 25-30
|
Judging the past. The case of the human radiation experiments.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RADIATION EXPERIMENTS;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COLD WAR;
COMPLICITY;
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY;
CULTURAL FACTOR;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MORALITY;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RADIATION INJURY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
TWENTIETH CENTURY;
UNITED STATES;
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RADIATION EXPERIMENTS;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COLD WAR;
TWENTIETH CENTURY;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
COMPLICITY;
CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS;
CULTURAL DIVERSITY;
ETHICAL ANALYSIS;
ETHICAL RELATIVISM;
ETHICS COMMITTEES;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
HIPPOCRATIC OATH;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERNATIONALITY;
JUDGMENT;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
RADIATION INJURIES;
RETROSPECTIVE MORAL JUDGMENT;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
SOCIAL VALUES;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0030138217
PISSN: 00930334
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3527929 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (22)
|
References (0)
|