Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 282-289

  Tan, Han Kuang ^a,b   Hooper, Peter M ^a,c   Baergen, Carolyn G ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Faculty of Dentistry

^c Department of Mathematical Sciences ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; PLASTIC; POLYMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMPREGUM; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MAXILLA; OBSERVER VARIATION; PLASTICS; POLYMERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030135945     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Woelfel JB, Hickey JC, Berg T. Contour variations in one patient's impressions made by seven dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;67:1-10.
2. Smith DE, Toolson LB, Bolender CL, Lord JL. One-step border molding of complete denture impressions using a polyether impression material. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:347-351.
3. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Hickey JC, Carlsson CE. Boucher's Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients, ed 10. St Louis: Mosby, 1990:181-189.
4. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments, ed 3. New York: Wiley, 1991:35.
5. Koran A. Impression materials for recording the denture-bearing mucosa. Dent Clin North Am 1980;24:97-111.
6. Jooste CH, Bradshaw D, DuToit I. The effect of a custom edentulous impression tray on lingual sulcus depth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:646-651.
7. McArthur DR. Management of the mucolabial fold when developing impressions for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:62-67.