Who understands? II: A survey of 27 words, phrases, or symbols used in proposed clinical research consent forms

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 8-10

  Waggoner, William C ^b   Sherman, Barbara B ^a  

^a Essex Institutional Review Board Inc   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; NOMENCLATURE; NURSE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STUDENT; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONSENT FORMS; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NURSES; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; STUDENTS; TERMINOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030134602     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3564041     Document Type: Review

References (2)

1. Waggoner, WC, and Mayo, DM: Who Understands? A survey of 25 words or phrases used in proposed clinical research forms. IRB 1995; 17:6-9.
2. McFarling, UL: Cancer consent forms found difficult to read. Boston Globe, 13 October 1994.