Penrith paradoxes from analysis to synthesis II - The revenge: A report of the symposium

Health Care Analysis

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 112-129

  Adams, Lee ^a   Armstrong, Ewan ^b  

^a Sheffield Health   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HEALTH PROMOTION; METHODOLOGY; SYMPOSIUM; TECHNIQUE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM;

GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PROMOTION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0030133784     PISSN: 10653058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199605)4:2<112::aid-hca175>3.0.co;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Symposium: a drinking party ..., OED
2. A snowballing method was adopted to bring together contributors to the literature and other active thinkers in this field.
3. Gallie, W.B. (1956). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.
4. Stocking,B., Jennett, B. and Spiby, J. (1991). Criteria for Change: the History and Impact of Consensus Development Conferences in the UK, King's Fund Centre.
5. Foster, P. (1996). Is there a future for radical health promotion? Health Care Analysis 4(2), 120-126.
6. Robertson, J. (1985). Future Work, Gower/Temple Smith.
7. Loughlin, M. (1996). Will there be a philosophy of health promotion? Health Care Analysis 4(2), 126-129.