Neurophysiological correlate of the auditory after-image (‘ZwickerTone’)

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 161-174

  Hoke, Ellen S ^a   Hoke, Manfried ^a   Ross, Bernhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

After image; Auditory; Auditory cortex; Cochlea; Magnetoencephalogram; Sustained response; Tinnitus; Zwicker tone

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NOISE; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS;

EID: 0030132904     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000259196     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bishop HH: An experimental investigation of the positive after-image in audition. Am J Psychol 1921:21: 305-325.
2. Rosenblith WA, Miller GA, Egan JP, Hirsh IJ, Thomas GJ: An auditors after-image? Science 1947:106: 333-334.
3. Man A, Naggan I: Characteristics of tinnitus in acoustic trauma. Audiology 1981;20:70-78.
4. Axelsson A, Sandh A: Tinnitus in noise-induced hearing loss. Br J Audio! 1985:19:271-276.
5. Zwicker E: ‘Negative afterimage’ in hearing. J Acoustic Soc Am 1964: 36:2413-2415.
6. Zwicker E. Fcldlkeller R: Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfanger. Stuttgart, Hirzel, 1967.
7. Lummis RC. Gutlman N: Exploratory studies of Zwickcr’s ‘negative afterimage' in hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1972:51:1930-1944.
8. Wilson JP: Psychoacoustics of obstacle detection using ambient or self-generated noise: in Busnel RG (ed): Animal Sonar Systems. Frascati Symposium. Jouy-en-Josas, 1966, pp 89-114.
9. Wilson JP: An auditory after-image; in Plomp R. Smoorenburg GF (eds): Frequency Analysis and Pitch Detection in Hearing. Leiden, Sijthoff. 1970, pp 303-318.
10. Krump G: Beschreibung des akustischen Nachtoncs mit Hilfe von Mithörschwellenmustern: Diss, München. 1993.
11. Krump G: Zum Zwicker-Ton bei Linienspektren mit spektraler Überhöhung; in Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA ‘94. Bad Honnef, DPG-GmbH. 1994. pp 1009-1012.
12. Fasti H. Krump G: Pitch of the Zwicker tone and masking patterns; in Manley GA. Klump GM, Koppl C. Fasti H, Oeckinghaus H (eds): Advances in Hearing Research. Singapore, World Scientific Publishers, 1996. pp 366-373.
13. Fcldmann H: Mechanisms of tinnitus; in Vernon JA. Moller AR (eds): Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, Allvn & Bacon. 1995, pp 35-50.
14. Pantev C, Hoke M, Liitkcnhoner B. Lehnertz K: Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: Pitch versus frequency representation. Science 1989;246:486-488.
15. Proefrock E. Hoke M: Contingent magnetic variation (CMV) studied with stimuli close to the hearing threshold in normal subjects and tinnitus patients; in Deecke L, BaumgartncrC. Stroink G. Williamson SJ (eds): Biomagnetism: Fundamental Research and Clinical Applications. Amsterdam. Elsevier, 1995, pp 234-239.
16. Annett M: The binomial distribution of right, mixed and left-handed. QJ Exp Psychol 1967;19:327-333.
17. Sarvas J: Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the bio-magnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 1987:32:11-22.
18. Csepe V, Pantev C, Hoke M, Hamp-son S, Ross B: Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: Localization of the mismatch field. Elec-troenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992: 84:538-548.
19. Pantev C, Eulitz C, Hampson S, Ross B, Roberts L,: The auditory evoked 'off response: Sources and comparison with the ‘on’ and the ‘sustained’ response. Ear Hear, in press.
20. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Liit-kenhoner B, Fahrendorf G, Stober U: Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatio-temporal resolution through combination of ncuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Elec-troenccph Clin Ncurophvsiol 1990: 75:173-184.
21. Pantev C. Hoke M. Lehnertz K. Lut-kenhoner B, Anogianakis G, Witt-kowski W: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:160-170.
22. Hillyard SS. Picton TW: On and off components in the auditory evoked potential. Percept Psychophys 1978; 24:391-398.
23. Picton TW, Woods DL, Proulx GB: Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1978;45:198-210.
24. Picton TW. Woods DL. Proulx GB: Human auditory' sustained potentials. I. The nature of the response. Electrocnccphalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;45:186-197.
25. Hari R, Pelizzonc M, Makela JP, Hallstrom J, Leinonen L, Lounas-maa OV: Neuromagnetie responses of the human auditory cortex to on-and offsets of noise bursts. Audiology 1987:26:31-43.
26. Pantcv C, Eulitz C, Elbert T, Hoke M: The auditory evoked sustained field: Origin and frequency dependence. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:82-90.
27. Pantev C, Eulitz C, Elbert T, Hoke M: Origin of the auditory evoked sustained field; in Dcecke L, Baumgartner C, Stroink G, Williamson SJ (eds): Biomagnetism: Fundamental Research and Clinical Applications. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1995, pp 179-185.
28. Huotilainen M. Tiitinen H, Lavi-kainen J. Ilmoniemi RJ. Pekkonen E. Sinkkonen J, Laine P. Näätänen R: Sustained fields of tones and glides reflect tonotopy of the auditory cortex. Neuroreport 1995;6:841-844.
29. Pcronnet F. Michel F: The asymmetry of the auditory potentials in normal man and in patients with brain lesions; in Desmcdt JE (ed): Audito-rv-Evoked Potentials in Man. Psychopharmacology Correlates of EPs. Progr Clin Neurophysiol. Basel, Karger, 1977, vol 2, pp 130-141.
30. Piéton TW. Campbell KB. Bari-beau-Braun J. Proulx GB: The neurophysiology of human attention: A tutorial review; in Requin J (ed): Attention and Performance. VII. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum. 1978. pp 429-467.
31. Hari R, Sams M, Jarvilchto T: Auditory evoked transient and sustained potentials in the human EEG. I. Effects of expectation of stimuli. Psychiatry Res 1979;1:297-306
32. Hari R. Hämäläinen M, Kaukoran-ta E. Mäkelä J, Joutsiniemi SL, Tii-honen J: Selective listening modifies activity of the human auditory cortex. Exp Brain Res 1989:74:463-470.
33. Lavikaincn J, Huotilainen M, Hmoniemi RJ, Simola JT, Näätänen R: Pitch change of a continuous tone activates two distinct processes in human auditory cortex: A study with whole-head magnetometer. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:93-96.
34. Hoke ES, Hoke M, Ross B: Similarities between neuromagnetic correlates of the Zwicker tone and of tonal tinnitus, in preparation.
35. Hoke ES: Objektive Korrelate endogener Hörempfindungen; Diss, Münster, 1996.