Fit to diastolic arterial pressure by third-order lumped model yields unreliable estimates of arterial compliance

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 225-233

  Fogliardi, R ^a   Burattini, Roberto ^a,b   Shroff, S G ^c   Campbell, K B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Methoxamine; Modified windkessel model; Pressure pulse contour analysis; Sodium nitroprusside; Vascular parameter estimation

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETICS; BLOOD VESSELS; DISEASES; DRUG THERAPY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY;

DIASTOLIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE; METHOXAMINE; MODIFIED WINDKESSEL MODEL; PRESSURE PULSE CONTOUR ANALYSIS; SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE; THIRD ORDER LUMPED MODEL; VASCULAR PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

HEMODYNAMICS;

METHOXAMINE; NITROPRUSSIDE SODIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTERY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DOG; ELASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030131007     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00042-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Milnor WR. Hemodynamics. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1982.
2. O'Rourke MF. Arterial Function in Health and Desease. Edinburgh: Churchill and Livingstone, 1982.
3. Yin FCP, Liu Z. Arterial compliance-physiological viewpoint. In: Westerhof N and Gross DR eds, Vascular Dynamics: Physiological Perspectives. New York: Plenum, 1989: pp. 9-22.
4. Elzinga G, Westerhof N. Pressure and flow generated by the left ventricle against different impedances. Circ Res 1973; 32: 178-86.
5. Sunagawa K, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Stroke volume effect of changing arterial input impedance over selected frequency ranges. Am J Physiol 1985; 248: Heart Circ Physiol 17 H477-84.
6. Baan J, Szidon JP, Noordergraaf A. Dynamic local distensibility of living arteries and its relation to wave transmission, Biophys J 1974; 14: 343-62.
7. Burattini R, Montanari L, Mulligan LJ, Cannon MS, Gross DR. Evaluation of hypercholesterol diet-induced changes in viscoelastic properties of carotid circulation in pigs. Am J Physiol 1992; 263 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 32): H1919-26.
8. Cox RH. Pressure dependence of the mechanical properties of arteries in vivo. Am J Physiol 1975; 229(5): 1371-5.
9. Cox RH, Detweiler DK. Arterial wall properties and dietary atherosclerosis in the racing greyhound. Am J Physiol 1979; 236(6): H790-7.
10. Gross DR. Compliance and aging. In: Westerhof N and Gross DR, eds. Vascular Dynamics: Physiological Perspectives. New York: Plenum, 1989: pp. 37-47.
11. Learoyd BM, Taylor MG. Alterations with age in the viscoelastic properties of human arterial walls. Circ Res 1966; 18: 278-92.
12. O'Rourke M. Arterial stiffness, systolic blood pressure and logical treatment of arterial hypertension. Hypertension 1990; 15: 339-47.
13. Randall OS, Van den Bos GC, Westerhof N. Systemic compliance: Does it play a role in the genesis of essential hypertension? Cardiovasc Res 1984; 18: 455-62.
14. Burattini R, Gnudi G, Westerhof N, Fioretti S. Total systemic arterial compliance and aortic characteristic impedance in the dog as a function of pressure: a model based study. Comput Biomed Res 1987; 20: 154-65.
15. Liu Z, Brin KP, Yin FCP. Estimation of total arterial compliance: an improved method and evaluation of current methods. Am J Physiol 1986; 251 (Heart Circ Physiol 20): H588-600.
16. Toy SM, Melbin J, Noordergraaf A. Reduced models of arterial systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; 32: 174-6.
17. Westerhof N, Elzinga G, Sipkema P. An artificial arterial system for pumping hearts. J Appl Physiol 1971; 31: 776-81.
18. Goldwin RM, Watt TB. Arterial pressure pulse contour analysis via a mathematical model for the clinical quantification of human vascular properties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1967; 14: 11-7.
19. Watt TB, Burrus CS. Arterial pressure contour analysis for estimating human vascular properties. J Appl Physiol 1976; 40: 171-6.
20. Finkelstein SM, Cohn JN. First- and Third-order models for determining arterial compliance. J Hypertension 1992; 10 (Suppl 6): S11-4.
21. Finkelstein SM, Cohn JN, Collins VR, Carlyle PF, Shelley WJ. Vascular hemodvnamic impedance in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 423-7.
22. Finkelstein SM, Collins VR, and Cohn JN. Arterial vascular compliance response to vasodilators by Fourier and pulse contour analysis. Hypertension 1988; 12: 380-7.
23. Zobel LR, Finkelstein SM, Carlyle PF, and Cohn JN. Pressure pulse contour analysis in determining the effect of vasodilator drugs on vascular hemodynamic impedance characteristics in dogs. Am Heart J 1980; 100: 81-8.
24. Burattini R, Fioretti S, Jetto L. A simple algorithm for defining the mean cardiac cycle of aortic flow and pressure during steady state. Comput Biomed Res 1985; 18: 303-12.
25. Bard Y. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
26. Tsitlik JE, Halperin HR, Popel AS, Shoukas AA, Yin FCP, Westerhof N. Modeling the circulation with three terminal electrical networks containing special nonlinear capacitors. Ann Biomed Eng 1992, 20: 595-616.
27. Burattini R, Campbell KB. Effective distributed compliance of the canine descending aorta estimated by modified T-tube model. Am J Physiol 1993; 264 (Heart Circ Physiol 33): H1977-87.
28. Burattini R, Fogliardi R, Campbell KB. Lumped model of terminal aortic impedance in the dog. Ann Biomed Eng 1994, 22: 381-91.