Current density surveys for optimizing offshore anode retrofit design

Materials Performance

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 19-23

  Jelinek, Jiri ^a   Herfjord, Bente O ^b   Blakset, Terje J ^b   Osvoll, Harald ^b   Morton, Derek ^c  

^a Elf Enterprise Caledonia Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b CorrOcean as ^*  (Norway)

^c CorrOcean Ltd ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANODES; CARBONATE MINERALS; CATHODIC PROTECTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; CURRENT DENSITY; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; RETROFITTING;

CALCAREOUS DEPOSIT; CURRENT DENSITY SURVEYS; GEOMETRY MODEL; IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEM; OFFSHORE ANODE RETROFIT DESIGN;

OFFSHORE STRUCTURES;

EID: 0030129983     PISSN: 00941492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. W. Keim, R.D. Strømmen, J. Jelinek, MP 25, 9 (1988): p. 25.
2. R.D. Strømmen, "Review of Offshore CP Design Criteria Based on In-Situ Current Density Measurements," UK Corrosion 1985, November 1985, p. 195 (London, UK: Institute of Corrosion, 1985).
3. Det Norske Veritas Industri Norge: Recommended Practice RP B401, Cathodic Protection Design, 1993.
4. H.H. Hartt, W.C. Hooper, "The Influence of Cathodic Polarization Upon Fatigue of Notched Structural Steel in Sea Water," CORROSION/77, paper no. 38 (Houston, TX: NACE, 1977).