Learning about novel operating environments: Designing by adaptive modelling

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 151-156

  Prabhakar, S ^a   Goel, A K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIROADAPT; MEDIUM INTERACTIVITY DEVICES;

DESIGN; ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; MECHANISMS; PERFORMANCE;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0030129357     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060400001438     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bhatta, S., & Goel, A. (1993). Learning generic mechanisms from experiences for analogical reasoning. Proc. Fifteenth Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc., pp. 237-242.
2. Bhatta, S., Goel, A., & Prabhakar, S. (1994). Innovation in analogical design: A model-based approach. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '94 (Gero, J.S. and Sudweeks, F., Eds.), pp. 57-74. Kluwer Publishers, Netherlands.
3. Goel, A. (1991). A model-based approach to case adaptation. Proc. Thirteenth Ann. Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc., 143-148.
4. Goel, A.K., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989). Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving. Proc. Eleventh Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell., 1388-1394.
5. Goel, A., & Prabhakar, S. (1994). A control architecture for redesign and design verification. Proc. Australian New Zealand Intell. Info. Syst. Conf., pp. 377-381. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
6. Prabhakar, S., & Goel, A.K. (1992). Performance driven creativity in design: Constraint discovery, model revision, and case composition. Second Int. Round-Table Conf. Computational Models of Creative Design, 101-127.
7. Prabhakar, S., Goel, A., & Bhatta, S. (1995). Adaptive modelling in the design of interactive devices: Towards a computational theory of engineering invention. Third Int. Round-Table Conf. Computational Models of Creative Design, 267-301.
8. Sembugamoorthy, V., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1986). Functional representation of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem solving systems. In Experience, Memory and Reasoning (Kolodner, J. and Riesbeck, C., Eds.), pp. 47-73. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Simon, H.A. (1981). The sciences of artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Simon, H.A. (1983). Why should machines learn? In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach (Michalski, R. S., Mitchell, T. M. and Carbonell, J., Eds.) pp. 25-37. Tioga Publishing Company, Palo Alto, CA.
11. Stroulia, E., & Goel, A.K. (1992). Generic teleological mechanisms and their use in case adaptation. Proc. Fourteenth Ann. Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc., 319-324.
12. Stroulia, E., Shankar, M., Goel, A., & Penberthy, L. (1992). A model-based approach to blame assignment in design, Technical Report, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.