Reconstructive derivational analogy: A machine learning approach to automating redesign

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 115-126

  Britt, B D ^a   Glagowski, T ^b  

^a EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Derivational Analogy; Design History; Design Reuse; Knowledge based Circuit Design

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT LAYOUT; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; SPECIFICATIONS;

DESIGN HISTORY; DESIGN REUSE; KNOWLEDGE BASED CIRCUIT DESIGN; RECONSTRUCTIVE DERIVATIONAL ANALOGY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0030128585     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060400001359     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alagappan, V., & Kozaczynski, W. (1991). The evolution of very large information systems. In Automating Software Design, (Lowry, M.R. and McCartney, R.D., Eds.), 3-24. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Barstow, D. (1984). A perspective on automatic programming. AI Magazine 5(1), 5-27.
3. Baxter, I. (1992). Design rationale for transformationally constructed software. Proc. AAAI Workshop on Design Rationale Capture and Use, 22-27.
4. Bhatta, S., Goel, A., & Prabhaker, S. (1994). Innovation in analogical design: A model based approach. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '94, (Gero, J.S. and Sudweeks, F., Eds.), 57-75. Kluwer Publishers, London.
5. Britt, B.D. (1995). Reconstructive derivational analogy. Ph.D. Dissertation, Washington State University.
6. Britt, B.D., & Glagowski, T.G. (1994). Explanation of designs through heuristic reasoning. In Intelligent Systems, (Yfantis, E.A., Ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 39-44. Kluwer, Amsterdam.
7. Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., & Carlini, U. (1992). A logic-based approach to reverse engineering tools production. IEEE Transactions on Software Eng. 18(12), 1053-1063.
8. Carbonell, J.G. (1986). Derivational analogy: A theory of reconstructive problem solving and expertise acquisition. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach 2 (pp. 371-392). Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA.
9. Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). Design problem solving: A task analysis AI Magazine 11(4), 59-71.
10. Coyne, R.D., Rosenman, M.A., Radtord, A.D., Balechandran, M., & Gero, J.S. (1990). Knowledge-based design systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MS.
11. Donaldson, I., & MacCallum, K. (1994). The role of computational prototypes in conceptual models for engineering design. In Artificial Intelligence and Design '94, (Gero, J.S., and Sudweeks, E, Eds.), pp. 1-20. Kluwer, London.
12. Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26-36.
13. Glagowski, T., Manwaring, M.L., Somanchi, S.V., & Sy, L.Y. (1991). Automated analog circuit design environment. Proc. Northcon 91, pp. 124-129.
14. Goel, A. (1991). A model based approach to case adaptation. Proc. 13th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society. Chicago, IL, pp. 143-148.
15. Huhns, M.N., & Acosta, R.D. (1988). ARGO: A system for design by analogy. IEEE Expert 3, 53-68.
16. Kant, E. (1985). Understanding and automating algorithm design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 11(11), 1361-1374.
17. Langrana, N., Mitchell, T., & Ramachandran, N. (1986). Progress toward a knowledge-based aid for mechanical design. Technical Memo CAIP-TM-002. Center for Computer Aids for Industrial Productivity, Rutgers University.
18. Liu, J., & Brown, D.C. (1994). Generating design decomposition knowledge for parametric design problems. In Artificial Intelligence and Design '94, (Gero, J.S. and Sudweeks, F., Eds.), pp. 661-678. Kluwer, London.
19. Lubars, M.D. (1991). The ROSE-2 strategies for supporting high-level software design reuse. In Automating Software Design, (Lowry, M.R. and McCartney, R.D., Eds.), pp. 93-120. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.
20. Maher, M.L. (1990). Process models for design synthesis. AI Magazine U(4), 49-58.
21. Mitchell, T.M., Mahadevan, S., & Steinberg, L. (1985). LEAP: A learning apprentice for VLSI design. Proc. Ninth Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), 573-580.
22. Mostow, J. (1989). Design by derivational analogy: Issues in the automated replay of design plans. Artif. Intell. 40(1), 119-184.
23. Mostow, J., & Barley, M. (1987). Automated reuse of design plans. Proc. 1987 Int. Conf. Eng. Design, 632-647.
24. Mostow, J., Barley, M., & Weinrich, T. (1989). Automated reuse of design plans. Artif. Intell. Eng. 4(4), 181-196.
25. Sacerdoti, E. (1974). Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces. Artif. Intell. 5, 115-135.
26. Sriram, D. (1988). Constraint-based design: An application in structural design. In Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Engineering Design, (Tong, C. and Sriram, D., Eds.), Addison-Wesley, New York.
27. Stefik, M. (1981a). Planning with constraints (MOLGEN: Part 1). Artif. Intell. 16(2), 111-140.
28. Stefik, M. (1981b). Planning with constraints (MOLGEN: Part 2). Artif. Intell. 16(2), 141-169.
29. Steinberg, L., & Mitchell, T. (1985). The redesign system: A knowledge-based approach to VLSI CAD. IEEE Design and Test 2(1), 45-54.